Literature DB >> 8883827

Suppression of synaptic transmission may allow combination of associative feedback and self-organizing feedforward connections in the neocortex.

M E Hasselmo1, M Cekic.   

Abstract

Selective suppression of synaptic transmission during learning is proposed as a physiological mechanism for combining associative memory function at feedback synapses with self-organization of feedforward synapses in neocortical structures. A computational model demonstrates how selective suppression of feedback transmission allows this combination of synaptic function. During learning, sensory stimuli and the desired response are simultaneously presented as input to the network. Feedforward connections form self-organized representations of input, while suppressed feedback connections learn the transpose of the feedforward connectivity. During recall, suppression of transmission is removed, input activates the self-organized representation, and activity settles into a learned solution to the problem. This computational model can be used for learning of problems which are not linearly separable, including the negative patterning task (the XOR problem). Experiments in brain slice preparations of the rat somatosensory cortex tested whether the combination of self-organization and associative memory function could be provided by cholinergic suppression selective for feedback versus feedforward synapses. The cholinergic agonist carbachol selectively suppressed synaptic potentials elicited by stimulation of layer I (which contains a high percentage of feedback synapses), while having no effect on synaptic potentials elicited by stimulation of layer IV (with a high percentage of afferent and feedforward synapses).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883827     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00010-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  21 in total

1.  Dynamic afferent synapses to decision-making networks improve performance in tasks requiring stimulus associations and discriminations.

Authors:  Mark A Bourjaily; Paul Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Basal forebrain dynamics during nonassociative and associative olfactory learning.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Nathaniel Pender-Morris; Owen Dean; David Smith; Christiane Linster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Cholinergic modulation of cortical function.

Authors:  M E Hasselmo; L M Giocomo
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Synergistic effects of genetic variation in nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on visual attention but not working memory.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; M-K Lin; R Sundararajan; K J Fryxell; R Parasuraman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  A model of cholinergic modulation in olfactory bulb and piriform cortex.

Authors:  Licurgo de Almeida; Marco Idiart; Christiane Linster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Distinct roles of bulbar muscarinic and nicotinic receptors in olfactory discrimination learning.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Licurgo de Almeida; Christiane Linster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Potential roles of cholinergic modulation in the neural coding of location and movement speed.

Authors:  Holger Dannenberg; James R Hinman; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2016-09-24

10.  A network model of behavioural performance in a rule learning task.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.