Literature DB >> 8883425

Multistage designs for phase II clinical trials: statistical issues in cancer research.

A Kramar1, D Potvin, C Hill.   

Abstract

The main objective of phase II clinical trials is to estimate treatment efficacy on a relatively small number of patients in order to decide whether the treatment ought to be studied in large-scale comparative trials. They play a key role in the drug development process, since the results determine whether or not to proceed to phase III trials. Multistage designs for phase II clinical trials proposed by Gehan, Fleming, Simon and Ensign are described and compared. Gehan's and Simon's designs have two stages, Fleming's designs can have two or more stages, and Ensign's three-stage design combines the first stage of Gehan with the two stages of Simon. Phase II clinical trial protocols and reports should include a description of the design selected with a justification for the particular choice. The present practice is very far from this ideal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883425      PMCID: PMC2075945          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  4 in total

1.  The determinatio of the number of patients required in a preliminary and a follow-up trial of a new chemotherapeutic agent.

Authors:  E A GEHAN
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1961-04

2.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

3.  An optimal three-stage design for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  L G Ensign; E A Gehan; D S Kamen; P F Thall
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  J Jack Lee; Diane D Liu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Extended two-stage adaptive designs with three target responses for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Seongho Kim; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Phase 2 results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 0537: a phase 2/3 study comparing acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus pilocarpine in treating early radiation-induced xerostomia.

Authors:  Raimond K W Wong; Jennifer L James; Stephen Sagar; Gwen Wyatt; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tân; Anurag K Singh; Barbara Lukaszczyk; Francis Cardinale; Alexander M Yeh; Lawrence Berk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Merrill S Kies; Bonnie S Glisson; Michael E Kupferman; Diane D Liu; J Jack Lee; Adel K El-Naggar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; George R Blumenschein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Re-formulating Gehan's design as a flexible two-stage single-arm trial.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Quality of reporting in oncology phase II trials: A 5-year assessment through systematic review.

Authors:  Julien Langrand-Escure; Romain Rivoirard; Mathieu Oriol; Fabien Tinquaut; Chloé Rancoule; Frank Chauvin; Nicolas Magné; Aurélie Bourmaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.