Literature DB >> 8883117

Ultrasound velocity and broadband attenuation over a wide range of bone mineral density.

S Han1, J Rho, J Medige, I Ziv.   

Abstract

Ultrasound velocity (UV) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) were studied in human and bovine bone with a wide range of bone mineral density (BMD). The BMD of 98 fresh specimens was measured by quantitative computed tomography: 42 cancellous specimens from women in the age group of 64 +/- 4 years; 51 bovine cancellous and 5 bovine cortical. BMD values ranged from 90 to 400 mg/cm3 for the human cancellous bone, 310 to 870 mg/cm3 for the bovine cancellous bone, and 1750 to 1780 mg/cm3 for the bovine cortical bone. BMD showed a strong linear correlation with apparent density over the entire range of density (r = 0.979). UV of human and bovine cancellous bone was 1480-2650 m/s and 2880-3100 m/s for bovine cortical bone. BUA values were 1-61 dB/MHz/cm for the cancellous specimens and 5-12 dB/MHz/cm for cortical specimens. UV was found to be linear with BMD for all specimens; however, BUA was linear with BMD only for the specimens from elderly women. A quadratic relationship between BUA and BMD was found when the bovine samples were included.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8883117     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  26 in total

1.  Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

Authors:  C C Glüer; M Vahlensieck; K G Faulkner; K Engelke; D Black; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  In vitro comparison of quantitative computed tomography and broadband ultrasonic attenuation of trabecular bone.

Authors:  M L McKelvie; J Fordham; C Clifford; S B Palmer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Ultrasonic velocity as a predictor of strength in bovine cancellous bone.

Authors:  C H Turner; M Eich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone.

Authors:  W Abendschein; G W Hyatt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparison of broadband ultrasonic attenuation of the os calcis and quantitative computed tomography of the distal radius.

Authors:  C J Hosie; D A Smith; A D Deacon; C M Langton
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1987-11

6.  Spine and femur density and broadband ultrasound attenuation of the calcaneus in normal Spanish women.

Authors:  S Palacios; C Menéndez; J Calderón; S Rubio
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C C Glüer; C Y Wu; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women.

Authors:  A Massie; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Characterization of the trabecular bone structure using frequency modulated ultrasound pulse.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Yi Xia; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The influence of porosity and pore size on the ultrasonic properties of bone investigated using a phantom material.

Authors:  R Strelitzki; J A Evans; A J Clarke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  R Morita; I Yamamoto; I Yuu; Y Hamanaka; T Ohta; M Takada; R Matsushita; K Masuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Template-guided vs. non-guided drilling in site preparation of dental implants.

Authors:  Uta Scherer; Marcus Stoetzer; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Constantin von See
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Interaction of Ultrasound With Cancellous Bone: A Review.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Measurements of the Relationship Between CT Hounsfield Units and Acoustic Velocity and How It Changes With Photon Energy and Reconstruction Method.

Authors:  Taylor D Webb; Steven A Leung; Jarrett Rosenberg; Pejman Ghanouni; Jeremy J Dahl; Norbert J Pelc; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Prediction of trabecular bone qualitative properties using scanning quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Yi-Xian Qin; Wei Lin; Erik Mittra; Yi Xia; Jiqi Cheng; Stefan Judex; Clint Rubin; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.413

8.  Associations between physical physique/fitness in children and bone development during puberty: a 4-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  Arata Akaike; Daisuke Suzuki; Shinya Okuyama; Yutaro Kudo; Hiroyasu Shimizu; Sara Takanashi; Kohei Makino; Junichi Yokoyama; Shigeyuki Nakaji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Investigation of the Effect of the Skull in Transcranial Photoacoustic Imaging: A Preliminary Ex Vivo Study.

Authors:  Rayyan Manwar; Karl Kratkiewicz; Kamran Avanaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.