Literature DB >> 8882239

Laryngoscopy using the McCoy laryngoscope after application of a cervical collar.

D A Gabbott1.   

Abstract

A rigid cervical collar was applied to 102 patients under general anaesthesia. Laryngoscopy was performed using a McCoy laryngoscope blade (size 3) initially in the standard Macintosh configuration followed by activation of the distal hinged tip. The two views obtained at laryngoscopy were graded according to standard guidelines. In 46/102 (45.1%) patients the laryngoscopic view was improved by one or more grades. In 10/102 (9.8%) the view was improved by two grades. Difficult laryngoscopy (grade 3 or 4) was encountered in 26/102 patients using the McCoy laryngoscope in the unactivated position (Macintosh configuration). Of these 26 patients, 24 (92.3%) had glottic structures identified (grade 1 or 2) when the distal tip of the laryngoscope blade was activated (p < 0.001). The McCoy laryngoscope significantly improves the view at laryngoscopy in the patient whose neck is immobilised in a rigid cervical collar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8882239     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb12606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildirim; Hasan A Kiraz; İbrahim Ağaoğlu; Okhan Akdur
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Optimal external laryngeal manipulation versus McCoy blade in active position in patients with poor view of glottis on direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Arumugam Vasudevan; Ranjani Venkat; Ashok Shankar Badhe
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-01

3.  Comparison of the clinical use of macintosh and miller laryngoscopes for orotracheal intubation by second-month nurse students in anesthesiology.

Authors:  Somchai Amornyotin; Ungkab Prakanrattana; Phongthara Vichitvejpaisal; Thantima Vallisut; Neunghathai Kunanont; Ladda Permpholprasert
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-03-22

4.  Comparison of the use of McCoy and TruView EVO2 laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization.

Authors:  Jiju Joseph; Trevor Sequeira; Madhusudan Upadya
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-07

5.  A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine.

Authors:  Neerja Bharti; Suman Arora; Nidhi B Panda
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

6.  Comparison of hemodynamic responses to intubation: Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope versus McCoy laryngoscope in presence of rigid cervical collar simulating cervical immobilization for traumatic cervical spine.

Authors:  Nitesh Gill; Shobha Purohit; Poonam Kalra; Tarun Lall; Avneesh Khare
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

7.  Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Kwon Hui Seo; Kyung Mi Kim; Hyunji John; Joo Hyun Jun; Minsoo Han; Soyoun Kim
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Comparison between Air Q and intubating laryngeal mask airway as intubation conduits in patients with simulated fixed cervical spine: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Renu Bala; Jasmine Basumatary; Priyanka Bansal
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2023 Jan-Mar

9.  Do Difficult Airway Techniques Predispose Obese Patients to Bronchospasm?

Authors:  Polyhronis Ieropoulos; Vassilios Tassoudis; Nick Ntafoulis; Ioanna Mimitou; George Vretzakis; George Tzovaras; Dimitrios Zacharoulis; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-25

10.  Comparative effectiveness of McCoy laryngoscope and CMAC(®) videolaryngoscope in simulated cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  Divya Jain; Indu Bala; Komal Gandhi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.