Literature DB >> 8881319

Attentional focusing with quantifiers in production and comprehension.

A J Sanford1, L M Moxey, K B Paterson.   

Abstract

There is a very large number of quantifiers in English, so many that it seems impossible that the only information that they convey is about amounts. Building on the earlier work of Moxey and Sanford (1987), we report three experiments showing that positive and negative quantifiers focus on different subsets of the logical possibilities that quantifiers allow semantically. Experiments 1 and 2 feature a continuation task with quantifiers that span a full range of denotations (from near 0% to near 100%) and show that the effect is not restricted to quantifiers denoting small amounts. This enables a distinction to be made between generalization and complement set focus proper. The focus effects extend to comprehension, as shown by a self-paced reading study (Experiment 3). It is noted that the focus effects obtained are compatible with findings from earlier work by Just and Carpenter (1971), which used a verification paradigm, and in fact these effects constitute a direct test of inferences Just and Carpenter made about mechanisms of encoding negative quantifiers. A related but different explanation is put forward to explain the present data. The experiments show a quantifier function beyond the simple denotation of amount.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8881319     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Relative informativeness of quantifiers used in syllogistic reasoning.

Authors:  Mike Oaksford; Lisa Roberts; Nick Chater
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information.

Authors:  B Kaup
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

3.  Distinguishing the time course of lexical and discourse processes through context, coreference, and quantified expressions.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  When being included is being excluded: a note on complement set focus and the inclusion relation.

Authors:  A J Sanford; C Williams; N Fay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

5.  Complement Anaphora in Spanish: Proportional References and Discourse Relations.

Authors:  Iker Zulaica-Hernández
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-04

6.  Irony as a Test of the Presupposition-Denial Account: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Ruth Filik; Joanne Ingram; Linda Moxey; Hartmut Leuthold
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-08-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.