Literature DB >> 8880475

Why don't ruminal bacteria digest cellulose faster?

P J Weimer1.   

Abstract

The bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, and Ruminococcus albus generally are regarded as the predominant cellulolytic microbes in the rumen. Comparison of available data from the literature reveals that these bacteria are the most actively cellulolytic of all mesophilic organisms described to date from any habitat. In light of numerous proposals to improve microbial cellulose digestion in ruminants, it is instructive to examine the characteristics of these species that contribute to their superior cellulolytic capabilities and to identify the factors that prevent them from digesting cellulose even more rapidly. As a group, these species have extreme nutritional specialization. They are able to utilize cellulose (or in some cases xylan) and its hydrolytic products as their nearly sole energy sources for growth. Moreover, each species apparently has evolved to similar maximum rates of cellulose digestion (first-order rate constants of 0.05 to 0.08 h-1). Active cellulose digestion involves adherence of cells to the fibers via a glycoprotein glycocalyx, which protects cells from protozoal grazing and cellulolytic enzymes from degradation by ruminal proteases while it retains-at least temporarily-the cellodextrin products for use by the cellulolytic bacteria. These properties result in different ecological roles for the adherent and nonadherent populations of each species, but overall provide an enormous selective advantage to these cellulolytic bacteria in the ruminal environment. However, major constraints to cellulose digestion are caused by cell-wall structure of the plant (matrix interactions among wall biopolymers and low substrate surface area) and by limited penetration of the nonmotile cellulolytic microbes into the cell lumen. Because of these constraints and the highly adapted nature of cellulose digestion by the predominant cellulolytic bacteria in the rumen, transfer of cellulolytic capabilities to noncellulolytic ruminal bacteria (e.g., by genetic engineering) that display other desirable properties offers limited opportunities to improve ruminal digestion of cellulose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880475     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76509-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  15 in total

Review 1.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Fiber-associated spirochetes are major agents of hemicellulose degradation in the hindgut of wood-feeding higher termites.

Authors:  Gaku Tokuda; Aram Mikaelyan; Chiho Fukui; Yu Matsuura; Hirofumi Watanabe; Masahiro Fujishima; Andreas Brune
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fibrobacter communities in the gastrointestinal tracts of diverse hindgut-fermenting herbivores are distinct from those of the rumen.

Authors:  Anthony P Neumann; Caroline A McCormick; Garret Suen
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  The complete genome sequence of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 reveals a cellulolytic and metabolic specialist.

Authors:  Garret Suen; Paul J Weimer; David M Stevenson; Frank O Aylward; Julie Boyum; Jan Deneke; Colleen Drinkwater; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Olga Chertkov; Lynne A Goodwin; Cameron R Currie; David Mead; Phillip J Brumm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Maximizing efficiency of rumen microbial protein production.

Authors:  Timothy J Hackmann; Jeffrey L Firkins
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Effect of sugarcane fiber digestibility, conservation method and concentrate level on the ruminal ecosystem of beef cattle.

Authors:  Johnny Maciel de Souza; Dannylo Oliveira de Sousa; Bruno Souza de Mesquita; Lígia Garcia Mesquita; Luis Felipe Prada Silva
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Effect of Oats and Wheat Genotype on In Vitro Gas Production Kinetics of Straw.

Authors:  Karen A Peñailillo; María Fernanda Aedo; María Carolina Scorcione; Mónica L Mathias; Claudio Jobet; Manuel Vial; Iris A Lobos; Rodolfo C Saldaña; Paul Escobar-Bahamondes; Paulina Etcheverría; Emilio M Ungerfeld
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Metagenomic insights into the carbohydrate-active enzymes carried by the microorganisms adhering to solid digesta in the rumen of cows.

Authors:  Lingling Wang; Ayat Hatem; Umit V Catalyurek; Mark Morrison; Zhongtang Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal dynamics of fibrolytic and methanogenic rumen microorganisms during in situ incubation of switchgrass determined by 16S rRNA gene profiling.

Authors:  Hailan Piao; Medora Lachman; Stephanie Malfatti; Alexander Sczyrba; Bernhard Knierim; Manfred Auer; Susannah G Tringe; Roderick I Mackie; Carl J Yeoman; Matthias Hess
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Antibiotic pretreatment minimizes dietary effects on reconstructure of rumen fluid and mucosal microbiota in goats.

Authors:  Hong Shen; Zhongyan Lu; Zhihui Xu; Zanming Shen
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.