Literature DB >> 8880362

Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential.

J Ellwanger1, J P Rosenfeld, J J Sweet, M Bhatt.   

Abstract

To investigate whether the P300 (P3) event-related potential (ERP) can be used as an index of the intactness of recognition memory in subjects trying to simulate amnesia, two groups of subjects (n = 12 and n = 15) were instructed to simulate amnesia and one group of control subjects (n = 14) did not simulate amnesia while taking three recognition tests, during which ERPs were recorded. The three tests consisted of three different types of memory items: (1) the subject's birthday (birth), (2) the experimenter's name (name), (3) a word list of 14 nouns (words). The memory item was presented in a random series with other, similar in type, non-memory items. In group tests, memory items evoked larger amplitude P3s than non-memory items (p < 0.001). Within-subjects tests were used to determine whether the P3 amplitude in response to memory items was larger than the P3 amplitude in response to non-memory items for each individual. There was no difference between the sensitivity of the best within-subjects tests for amnesia simulators (birth = 0.9, name = 0.85, words = 0.53) versus non-simulators (birth = 1.0, name = 0.81, words = 0.5) averaged across the three test types. This suggests that P3 used as an index of the intactness of recognition memory may be useful in cases of suspected malingering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880362     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(96)00035-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive event-related potentials in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  I Reinvang
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Distinguishing Between Genuine and Feigned Dementia Using Event-related Potentials.

Authors:  August M Price; Rocco Palumbo; Anna Marin; Prayerna Uppal; Cheongmin Suh; Andrew E Budson; Katherine W Turk
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.590

3.  New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: applying reaction time and event-related potentials.

Authors:  Victoria L Vagnini; David T R Berry; Jessica A Clark; Yang Jiang
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  P300 amplitudes in the concealed information test are less affected by depth of processing than electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Item Roles Explored in a Modified P300-Based CTP Concealed Information Test.

Authors:  Gáspár Lukács; Alicja Grządziel; Marleen Kempkes; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2019-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.