Literature DB >> 8878497

Surveillance of colorectal cancer: effectiveness of early detection of intraluminal recurrences on prognosis and survival of patients treated for cure.

P Barillari1, G Ramacciato, G Manetti, A Bovino, P Sammartino, V Stipa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The authors evaluate the effectiveness of routine colonoscopy and marker evaluation in diagnosis of intraluminal recurrent cancer.
METHODS: Chart review was conducted on 481 patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer between 1980 and 1990. Clinical visits were scheduled and carcinoembryonic antigen evaluation was performed every three months, and colonoscopy was performed preoperatively, 12 to 15 months after surgical treatment, and then with intervals of 12 to 24 months or when symptoms appeared.
RESULTS: About 10 percent of patients developed intraluminal recurrences. More than one-half of metachronous lesions arose within the first 24 months, and median time to diagnosis was 25 months. Patients with left-sited tumors in the advanced stage had a higher risk of developing recurrent intraluminal disease. Twenty-nine patients underwent a second surgical operation, of which 17 cases were radical. In this group, the five-year survival was 70.6 percent, although no nonradically treated or nonresected patients survived longer than 31 months. Twenty-two patients were asymptomatic at time of diagnosis of recurrence, and of these, 12 patients underwent radical operation; on the other hand, of the 24 symptomatic patients, only 5 were treated radically. Carcinoembryonic antigen was the first sign of recurrence in eight cases. Colonoscopy must be performed within the first 12 to 15 months after operation, whereas an interval of 24 months between examinations seems sufficient to guarantee early detection of metachronous lesions.
CONCLUSION: Serial tumor marker evaluation is of help in earlier diagnosis of local recurrences. Asymptomatic patients more frequently undergo another operation for cure and thus have a better survival rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8878497     DOI: 10.1007/bf02054052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  19 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group.

Authors:  Yuzuru Tamaru; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Yuko Hiraga; Toshio Kuwai; Akira Furudoi; Tadamasa Tamura; Masaki Kunihiro; Hideharu Okanobu; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Makoto Higashiyama; Koji Arihiro; Kazuya Kuraoka; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark Jeffery; Brigid E Hickey; Phil N Hider; Adrienne M See
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-24

3.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Surveillance after curative treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric P van der Stok; Manon C W Spaander; Dirk J Grünhagen; Cornelis Verhoef; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Colonoscopic screening and follow-up for colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Jun Wan; Zi-Qi Zhang; Cheng Zhu; Meng-Wei Wang; Dong-Hai Zhao; Yong-He Fu; Jian-Ping Zhang; Ya-Hong Wang; Ben-Yan Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endorectal ultrasound-directed biopsy: a useful technique to detect local recurrence of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Morken; Nancy N Baxter; Robert D Madoff; Charles O Finne
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Matthias Egger; Mark P Saunders; Sarah T O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

8.  Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo De Sanctis; Giovanni Lezoche; Paolo Massucco; Massimo Summa; Rosaria Gesuita; Lorenzo Capussotti; Giuseppe Spinoglio; Emanuele Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Do socially deprived urban areas have lesser supplies of cancer care services?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Yulei He; S V Subramanian; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The high yield of 1-year colonoscopy after resection: is it the handoff?

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Jesse Moore; Peter Cataldo; Turner Osler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.