Literature DB >> 887783

Effect of radiation and contrast media on chromosomes. Preliminary report.

F H Adams, A Norman, R S Mello, D Bass.   

Abstract

Measurements of chromosome aberrations or micronuclei in lymphocytes obtained from 7 patients indicate that angiocardiography produced chromosome damage corresponding to an average absorbed dose of about 50 rads. This is an order of magnitude larger than was estimated from the exposure rate. Experiments on lymphocytes suspended in solutions of methylglucamine and sodium diatrizoate (Renografin) or sodium diatrizoate alone (Hypaque) indicate that the chromosome damage observed in the patients is due in larger part to two effects: (a) an increased absorption of x rays as compared to blood and (b) a breakage of chromosomes even in the absence of x rays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 887783     DOI: 10.1148/124.3.823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study.

Authors:  Dominik Geisel; Elke Zimmermann; Matthias Rief; Johannes Greupner; Michael Laule; Fabian Knebel; Bernd Hamm; Marc Dewey
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Inadvertent thyroid irradiation in protocol-driven trauma CT: a survey of hospital ERs.

Authors:  Stephen R Baker; Yih-Hann H Hsieh; Pierre D Maldjian; Michael T Scanlan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-01-09

3.  Nanodiamonds and nanoparticles as tumor cell radiosensitizers-promising results but an obscure mechanism of action.

Authors:  Martin Falk
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-01

4.  Systematic survey of the dose enhancement in tissue-equivalent materials facing medium- and high-Z backscatterers exposed to X-rays with energies from 5 to 250 keV.

Authors:  M Seidenbusch; D Harder; D Regulla
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  Energy-dependent effect of iodized contrast medium on radiation-induced chromosome aberrations.

Authors:  W Hadnagy; A Bäuml; G Stephan
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Enhanced radiation dose and DNA damage associated with iodinated contrast media in diagnostic X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Richard Harbron; Elizabeth A Ainsbury; Simon D Bouffler; Rick J Tanner; Jonathan S Eakins; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Induction of micronuclei in PHA-stimulated human lymphocyte cultures by therapeutic radiation.

Authors:  M M Reddy; K O Goh; L H Hempelmann
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-03-15

8.  Synchrotron radiation-based experimental determination of the optimal energy for cell radiotoxicity enhancement following photoelectric effect on stable iodinated compounds.

Authors:  S Corde; A Joubert; J F Adam; A M Charvet; J F Le Bas; F Estève; H Elleaume; J Balosso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Optimal energy for cell radiosensitivity enhancement by gold nanoparticles using synchrotron-based monoenergetic photon beams.

Authors:  Wan Nordiana Rahman; Stéphanie Corde; Naoto Yagi; Siti Aishah Abdul Aziz; Nathan Annabell; Moshi Geso
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 10.  Standards and Methodologies for Characterizing Radiobiological Impact of High-Z Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Anna Subiel; Reece Ashmore; Giuseppe Schettino
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.