BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma of the pancreas is unresectable for cure in the majority of patients. We reviewed our results and cost effectiveness of surgical and endoscopic biliary bypass for unresectable pancreatic cancer to evaluate the comparable outcomes. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1992, 136 patients were managed operatively or endoscopically for pancreatic carcinoma. Excluding potentially curative resections and patients without follow-up, 34 patients endoscopically stented and 32 patients surgically bypassed were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean patient age was older (72.1 vs. 69.3 years) but average performance status was comparable (0.8 vs. 0.9 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grading) in the medical treatment group. The initial hospital stay was significantly longer for surgical patients (mean 14 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), with higher average charges ($18,325 vs. $9,663). Twelve stented patients required rehospitalization (average charge of $4,029), and eight surgical patients were readmitted (average charge of $6,776). An average of 1.7 stent changes (average charge $1,190) were required. Mean survival was longer for the stented group (9.7 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stenting for unresectable pancreatic cancer provides equivalent duration of survival at reduced cost and shorter hospital stay, although subsequent stent changes are necessary. When curative resection is not possible, endoscopic biliary drainage should be considered a good first choice for palliative management.
BACKGROUND:Ductal carcinoma of the pancreas is unresectable for cure in the majority of patients. We reviewed our results and cost effectiveness of surgical and endoscopic biliary bypass for unresectable pancreatic cancer to evaluate the comparable outcomes. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1992, 136 patients were managed operatively or endoscopically for pancreatic carcinoma. Excluding potentially curative resections and patients without follow-up, 34 patients endoscopically stented and 32 patients surgically bypassed were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean patient age was older (72.1 vs. 69.3 years) but average performance status was comparable (0.8 vs. 0.9 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group grading) in the medical treatment group. The initial hospital stay was significantly longer for surgical patients (mean 14 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), with higher average charges ($18,325 vs. $9,663). Twelve stented patients required rehospitalization (average charge of $4,029), and eight surgical patients were readmitted (average charge of $6,776). An average of 1.7 stent changes (average charge $1,190) were required. Mean survival was longer for the stented group (9.7 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stenting for unresectable pancreatic cancer provides equivalent duration of survival at reduced cost and shorter hospital stay, although subsequent stent changes are necessary. When curative resection is not possible, endoscopic biliary drainage should be considered a good first choice for palliative management.
Authors: R P van den Bosch; G P van der Schelling; J H Klinkenbijl; P G Mulder; M van Blankenstein; J Jeekel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1994-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Mohammad H Jamal; Suhail A Doi; Eve Simoneau; Jad Abou Khalil; Mazen Hassanain; Prosanto Chaudhury; Jean Tchervenkov; Peter Metrakos; Jeffrey S Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Rodrigo Castaño; Tercio L Lopes; Oscar Alvarez; Victor Calvo; Leticia P Luz; Everson L A Artifon Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sonia Gosain; Hugo Bonatti; LaVone Smith; Michele E Rehan; Andrew Brock; Anshu Mahajan; Melissa Phillips; Henry C Ho; Kristi Ellen; Vanessa M Shami; Michel Kahaleh Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.647