Literature DB >> 8876495

Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion.

S Shanker1, P Ngan, D Wade, M Beck, C Yiu, U Hägg, S H Wei.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatment and posttreatment maxillary changes achieved with maxillary protraction therapy. The cephalometric records of 25 consecutively treated Chinese children with Class III malocclusions (mean age 8.4 years) were analyzed for cephalometric A point changes, which were then compared with an untreated, age and sex matched Class III control sample. A cephalometric maxillary superimposition technique was used to differentiate between the skeletal and the local contributions to the total A point change. Results showed that 6 months of maxillary protraction therapy produced a mean A point advancement of 2.4 mm compared with 0.2 mm in the control group. Of this advancement, 75% was found to be due to skeletal maxillary advancement and 25% was attributed to local remodeling. Significantly less downward movement of A point was found with treatment compared with the controls, which could be related to the direction of force application. No significant differences were found in the horizontal and the vertical movements of A point between the treatment and the control groups during the 12-month posttreatment period, indicating stability of early maxillary protraction in patients with Class III malocclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8876495     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70046-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  16 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Moritz Foersch; Collin Jacobs; Susanne Wriedt; Marlene Hechtner; Heinrich Wehrbein
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Tuba Unal; Husamettin Oktay; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Yixin Zhang; Zhen Fu; Haichao Jia; Yiping Huang; Xiaobei Li; Hao Liu; Weiran Li
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Reverse Forsus vs. facemask/rapid palatal expansion appliances in growing subjects with mild class III malocclusions : A randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Yavan; Aysegul Gulec; Metin Orhan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Claudia Toyama Hino; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Tung T Nguyen; Hugo J De Clerck; Lorenzo Franchi; James A McNamara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Keun-Woo Kim; Il-Hyung Yang; Jin-Young Choi; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Skeletal Class III malocclusion with unilateral congenitally missing maxillary incisor treated by maxillary protractor and edgewise appliances.

Authors:  Masako Tabuchi; Hayato Fukuoka; Ken Miyazawa; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Sexual dimorphism in the long-term stability (10 years) of skeletal Class III treatment.

Authors:  Natalia Tejedor; Conchita Martín; José Antonio Alarcón; María Dolores Oteo-Calatayud; Juan Carlos Palma-Fernández
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.