Literature DB >> 8874909

Patient maintained alfentanil target-controlled infusion for analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

M G Irwin1, R C Campbell, T S Lun, J C Yang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether alfentanil given by a pharmacokinetic-based target controlled infusion (TCI) system under patient control is a suitable analgesic technique for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).
METHODS: The design was an open, unblinded, noncomparative, prospective study. Forty outpatients undergoing ESWL were given patient maintained alfentanil TCI. Pain, nausea and sedation were assessed every 300 shocks. Vital signs were recorded every three minutes, pulse oximetry and electrocardiography being monitored continuously. Blood alfentanil concentration was measured for comparison with the predicted value.
RESULTS: Alfentanil consumption (median 1.34 mg, range 0.8-3.6) and measured levels following treatment (median 60 ng.ml-1, range 15.6-134.3) varied widely. The precision of the TCI system and the median prediction error (bias) were both 49%. The median of pain scores recorded during treatment was 4 (range 0-8). The median respiration rate was 15 bpm (range 10-23), three patients required oxygen (SaO2 < 92%) cardiovascular measurements were stable and there was no excessive sedation. The incidence of nausea was 15%. All patients were ready for hospital discharge within one hour following treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient maintained alfentanil TCI provides good analgesia for ESWL in the majority of patients with little sedation. Respiratory depression is uncommon but supplementary oxygen should be given prophylactically. There is considerable interindividual variation in demand for alfentanil indicating the usefulness of the patient control method. The TCI system underestimated alfentanil blood concentrations but this did not affect its clinical usefulness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874909     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  27 in total

1.  Patient controlled analgesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gallstones.

Authors:  Gustav Schelling; Gabriela Mendl; Werner Weber; Jürgen Pauletzki; Michael Sackmann; E Pöppel; K Peter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  The scientific basis of patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  L E Mather; H Owen
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.669

3.  Population pharmacokinetics of alfentanil: the average dose-plasma concentration relationship and interindividual variability in patients.

Authors:  P O Maitre; S Vozeh; J Heykants; D A Thomson; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Ventilatory and mental effects of alfentanil and fentanyl.

Authors:  F L Scamman; M M Ghoneim; K Korttila
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.105

5.  Determination of fentanyl and alfentanil in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection.

Authors:  K Kumar; D J Morgan; D P Crankshaw
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1987-08-07

6.  Evaluation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy without anesthesia using a Dornier HM3 lithotriptor without technical modifications.

Authors:  B Pettersson; H G Tiselius; A Andersson; I Eriksson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with alfentanil: analgesic efficacy and minimum effective concentrations.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; N Ribbert; G Horrichs-Haermeyer
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Patient-controlled analgesic infusions: alfentanil versus morphine.

Authors:  Harlan F Hill; Barbara A Coda; Adam M Mackie; Karen Iverson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.

Authors:  J C Scott; K V Ponganis; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  T K Daneshmend; G D Bell; R F Logan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for monitored anesthesia care combined with tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia in endoscopic nasal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical study.

Authors:  Kazim Karaaslan; Fahrettin Yilmaz; Nebahat Gulcu; Cemil Colak; Murat Sereflican; Hasan Kocoglu
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2007-03

Review 2.  Monitored anaesthesia care in the elderly: guidelines and recommendations.

Authors:  Margaret Ekstein; Doron Gavish; Tiberiu Ezri; Avi A Weinbroum
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  A comparative study on monitored anesthesia care.

Authors:  Jayashree Sen; Bitan Sen
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Dec

4.  The analgesic effect of inhalational Entonox for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hamid Mazdak; Parvaneh Abazari; Fatemeh Ghassami; Shekoofeh Najafipour
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-11-03

5.  Comparison of Different Analgesic Techniques for Pain Relief During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: a Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Afsaneh Fouladi; Aria Soleimani
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2017-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.