Literature DB >> 1408294

Patient-controlled analgesic infusions: alfentanil versus morphine.

Harlan F Hill1, Barbara A Coda, Adam M Mackie, Karen Iverson.   

Abstract

Previously, we found that cancer patients using a pharmacokinetically based patient-controlled intravenous infusion system (PKPCA) to regulate their own morphine infusion rates achieved more relief from oral mucositis pain than similar patients using morphine by bolus-dose PCA. In this study, we employed the PKPCA system to compare efficacy and side-effect intensities of 2 mu-selective opioid analgesics, alfentanil and morphine, in bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients self-administering the drugs to relieve pain from oral mucositis. Patients using morphine by PKPCA obtained more pain relief than patients regulating their own alfentanil infusions during the first 4 days of continuous opioid infusion therapy. Side-effect intensities did not differ between the 2 study groups. In contrast to patients using morphine for 4-14 days, those receiving alfentanil by PKPCA required unexpectedly high plasma concentrations of the drug to obtain equivalent pain relief. Our results indicate that either the relative potencies of these 2 mu-selective opioids differ from previous estimates or analgesic tolerance developed to alfentanil but not to morphine. We conclude that alfentanil has similar efficacy in control of prolonged pain in BMT patients, but the utility of alfentanil in long-term pain management may be limited by relatively rapid tolerance onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1408294     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90235-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  9 in total

Review 1.  Target-controlled infusion systems: role in anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  M C van den Nieuwenhuyzen; F H Engbers; J Vuyk; A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Oral morphine for cancer pain.

Authors:  Philip J Wiffen; Bee Wee; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-22

3.  Patient maintained alfentanil target-controlled infusion for analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  M G Irwin; R C Campbell; T S Lun; J C Yang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment.

Authors:  Jan E Clarkson; Helen V Worthington; Susan Furness; Martin McCabe; Tasneem Khalid; Stefan Meyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-08-04

Review 5.  Systematic review of antimicrobials, mucosal coating agents, anesthetics, and analgesics for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients.

Authors:  Deborah P Saunders; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Justin Allemano; Paolo Bossi; Marianne D van de Wetering; Nikhil G Rao; Carin Potting; Karis K Cheng; Annette Freidank; Michael T Brennan; Joanne Bowen; Kristopher Dennis; Rajesh V Lalla
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Patient-controlled analgesia. Pharmacokinetic and therapeutic considerations.

Authors:  H F Hill; L E Mather
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a pharmacokinetically-based patient-controlled analgesia system.

Authors:  H Hill; A Mackie; B Coda; R Schaffer; R Jacobson; C Benedetti
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Overview of current development in patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  C Lindley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.