Literature DB >> 8874693

Inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms.

B D McCarthy1, M U Yood, E A Boohaker, R E Ward, M Rebner, C C Johnson.   

Abstract

Routine mammographic screening increases detection of nonpalpable breast cancer. Timely follow-up of abnormalities is essential because delays may lead to postponement of treatment and decreased survival for women who have cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of women with an abnormal mammogram who do not have adequate follow-up and to determine factors associated with inadequate follow-up. The study was conducted in a metropolitan health system that includes a large urban teaching hospital in Detroit and 26 ambulatory care centers. From the radiology database, all women with an abnormal screening mammogram performed between January 1, 1992, and July 31, 1992 were identified. We defined adequate follow-up as follow-up within three months of due date. Follow-up status was determined using medical records and telephone interviews. The percentage of women with inadequate follow-up was calculated. Relative risks compared percentages of women with inadequate follow-up according to demographic and screening-related variables. We calculated adjusted relative risks using multivariate binomial regression. We identified 1,249 women with abnormal screening mammograms. Inadequate follow-up occurred for 226 (18.1%) of the women. Among women with follow-up recommended in 4-6 months, 36.8% had inadequate follow-up. Among women with immediate follow-up recommended (obtain additional views or outside films for comparison, ultrasound, biopsy, or surgical referral), 7.2% had inadequate follow-up. Inadequate follow-up was associated with lower estimated household income and no history of previous mammogram. Among women with inadequate follow-up who were interviewed, 87% reported that they had been notified of their results. We found that the percentage of women with inadequate follow-up of abnormal mammograms is high, especially among women who require six-month follow-up. Women with low income and no history of a previous mammogram were at greatest risk for inadequate follow-up. These results document a previously unrecognized problem with mammography screening and suggest that the implementation of tracking systems to ensure timely follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms is essential. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): mammography, follow-up, screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  22 in total

1.  The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population.

Authors:  Harmine M Zonderland; Thomas L Pope; Arend J Nieborg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

4.  Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Kam Reams; Lisa Calvocoressi; Amy Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Nancy M Liston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Predictors and barriers to timely medical follow-up after cardiovascular disease risk factor screening according to race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Dana J Edelman; Qian Gao; Lori Mosca
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Intervention Approaches for Addressing Breast Cancer Disparities among African American Women.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-08

7.  What influences diagnostic delay in low-income women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Cynthia M Mojica; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Automated critical test result notification system: architecture, design, and assessment of provider satisfaction.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Stacy D O'Connor; Katherine P Andriole; Luciano M Prevedello; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Peer navigation improves diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening among Korean American women: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Angela M Jo; Catherine M Crespi; Madhuri Sudan; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Patient- and system-related barriers for the earlier diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Terry L Wahls; Ika Peleg
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.