Literature DB >> 8874686

Remember Tuskegee: public health student knowledge of the ethical significance of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.

S S Coughlin1, G D Etheredge, C Metayer, S A Martin.   

Abstract

The ethical problems that surrounded the Tuskegee Syphilis Study prompted widespread public criticism when they first surfaced in 1972; the Tuskegee Study remains an important case in bioethics. We recently examined public health student knowledge of the ethical significance of the Tuskegee Study as part of an ethics curriculum needs assessment at Tulane University. A brief questionnaire was administered to 236 graduate students currently enrolled in seven epidemiology courses. Basic demographic information was obtained along with information about degree program. A series of questions was then asked to assess student knowledge of bioethics including the ethical significance of the Tuskegee Study. Only 19% (46 of 236) of the students demonstrated knowledge of the ethical significance of the Tuskegee Study. Knowledge of the Tuskegee Study's ethical significance was higher among students who were from the United States and those who were enrolled in the epidemiology program (P < .05). The ethical problems that surrounded the Tuskegee Study have rarely been encountered in public health. However, this important case stands as an exemplar of the potential for ethical abuses in human subjects research. Such cases ought to be highlighted in public health curricula. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): blacks, African Americans, educational curriculum, epidemiology, ethics, public health, racism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Tuskegee Syphilis Study

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  7 in total

1.  Knowledge of the Tuskegee study and its impact on the willingness to participate in medical research studies.

Authors:  V L Shavers; C F Lynch; L F Burmeister
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Ethics instruction at schools of public health in the United States. Association of Schools of Public Health Education Committee.

Authors:  S S Coughlin; W H Katz; D R Mattison
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Scientific limitations and ethical ramifications of a non-representative Human Genome Project: African American response.

Authors:  Fatimah Jackson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis and public perceptions of biomedical research: a focus group study.

Authors:  Benjamin R Bates; Tina M Harris
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Assessing the readiness of black churches to engage in health disparities research.

Authors:  Molly De Marco; Bryan Weiner; Shelly-Ann Meade; Monica Hadley; Carlton Boyd; Moses Goldmon; Melissa Green; Michelle Manning; Daniel L Howard; Paul Godley; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Misinformation and misbeliefs in the Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis fuel mistrust in the healthcare system.

Authors:  Robert M White
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  The tuskegee experiment: an introduction in ethics for pre-healthcare professional students.

Authors:  Daniel Miranda; David Jesse Sanchez
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.