Literature DB >> 8874443

Ocular elasticity. Is engineering stiffness a more useful characterization parameter than ocular rigidity?

P P Purslow1, W S Karwatowski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to present an analysis of the pressure-volume relation of the eye in basic engineering terms, so as to characterize the deformability of the ocular shell based on its intrinsic stiffness (Young modulus) and morphology, as opposed to the empirical measure of ocular rigidity.
METHODS: Starting from the structural mechanics equations describing the stress of spherical thin-walled vessels, the differential equation governing the eye pressure-volume relation is derived. This analysis, which is more rigorous than previously published derivations, assumes that the ocular shell has a Poisson ratio of 0.5. This assumption is experimentally confirmed by ultrasonic measurements of changes in bovine corneal thickness with intraocular pressure.
RESULTS: Even with a number of simplifying assumptions, this basic analysis yields a complex result, showing that the Young modulus of the ocular shell material increases rapidly with distension of the eye, and is approximately proportional to the fourth power of the ocular shell radius.
CONCLUSION: Due to the complexity of the phenomenon, engineering analysis does not lead to a simple picture of pressure-volume relation of the eye. However, it does explicitly separate the material properties of the ocular shell from morphologic contributions to pressure-volume relation of the eye. This approach allows pathologic changes in the pressure-volume relation of the eye to be related more easily to the fundamental structural mechanisms governing the nonlinear mechanical properties of ocular shell materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874443     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30446-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Age related compliance of the lamina cribrosa in human eyes.

Authors:  J Albon; P P Purslow; W S Karwatowski; D L Easty
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues.

Authors:  Clayton T McKee; Julie A Last; Paul Russell; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Decrease in intraocular pressure following orthokeratology measured with a noncontact tonometer.

Authors:  Yasuhito Ishida; Ryoji Yanai; Takeshi Sagara; Teruo Nishida; Hiroshi Toshida; Akira Murakami
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  MR elastography of the ex vivo bovine globe.

Authors:  Daniel V Litwiller; Sung J Lee; Arunark Kolipaka; Yogesh K Mariappan; Kevin J Glaser; Jose S Pulido; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia.

Authors:  E Chihara; H Takahashi; K Okazaki; M Park; M Tanito
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye.

Authors:  B K Pierscionek; M Asejczyk-Widlicka; R A Schachar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Optical coherence elastography for assessing the influence of intraocular pressure on elastic wave dispersion in the cornea.

Authors:  Michael G Sun; Taeyoon Son; Joseph Crutison; Victor Guaiquil; Shujun Lin; Lara Nammari; Dieter Klatt; Xincheng Yao; Mark I Rosenblatt; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Measurement of Ocular Compliance Using iPerfusion.

Authors:  Joseph M Sherwood; Elizabeth M Boazak; Andrew J Feola; Kim Parker; C Ross Ethier; Darryl R Overby
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-25

9.  Smarce1 and Tensin 4 Are Putative Modulators of Corneoscleral Stiffness.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Boazak; Rebecca King; Jiaxing Wang; Cassandra M Chu; Aaron M Toporek; Joseph M Sherwood; Darryl R Overby; Eldon E Geisert; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.