Literature DB >> 8874347

Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to determine clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast and colorectal cancers. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials.
METHODS: Six tumor markers for colorectal cancer and seven for breast cancer were considered. They could be recommended or not for routine use or for special circumstances. In general, the significant health outcomes identified for use in making clinical practice guidelines (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used when data were available. Expert consensus was used to inform the recommendations for use of tumor markers when published evidence was insufficient. A computerized literature search was performed using Medline. In addition to reports collected by individual panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from January 1989 to April 1994 were collected for review and distributed to all members of the Panel. Values for use, utility, and levels of evidence were assigned by the expert reviewers and approved by the Panel. Tumor markers were assigned benefit if they had prognostic or predictive value that would lead to the favorable outcomes listed above. Harms considered were inappropriate disease management, and excess cost without definable benefit. Costs were considered but were never the sole determinant of a recommendation. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: For colorectal cancer, it is recommended that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels be measured preoperatively if it would change surgical management. It is recommended that CEA levels be monitored every 2 to 3 months for > or = 2 years, if resection of liver metastasis would be clinically indicated. The data are insufficient to recommend the routine use of lipid-associated sialic acid (LASA), CA 19-9, DNA index, DNA flow cytometric proliferation analysis, p53 tumor suppressor gene, and ras oncogene. For breast cancer, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor are recommended to be measured on every primary specimen, but on subsequent specimens only if it would lead to a change in management. The data are insufficient to recommend the routine use of DNA index, DNA flow cytometric proliferation analysis, CA 15-3, CEA, c-erbB-2, p53 or cathepsin-D. In the absence of readily measurable disease, CA 15-3 and CEA levels can be used to document treatment failure. New markers and new evidence will be evaluated by annual update of these guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8874347     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.10.2843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  73 in total

1.  The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C X Zheng; W H Zhan; J Z Zhao; D Zheng; D P Wang; Y L He; Z Q Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Ca 19-9 in the monitoring of colorectal cancer after surgery.

Authors:  F Franchi; C Pastore; P Izzo; E Calió
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer: current and new predictors of metastasis.

Authors:  D F Hayes; C Isaacs; V Stearns
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Increased alpha-fetoprotein receptor in the serum of patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  R Moro; J Gulyaeva-Tcherkassova; P Stieber
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Implications of CEA and p53 overexpression in the poor prognosis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Wesam A Nasif; Mahmoud Lotfy; Ibrahim H El-Sayed; Ayman El-Meghawry El-Kenawy; Mohamed El-Shahat; Nabil Gad El-Hak
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Tumour markers in internal medicine: a low-cost test or an unnecessary expense? A retrospective study based on appropriateness.

Authors:  D Arioli; M Pipino; E Boldrini; E Amateis; A Cristani; P Ventura; E Romagnoli; M C De Santis; M L Zeneroli
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-07-09       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  [Clinical utility of serous tumoural markers].

Authors:  A Martín Suárez; L Alonso Díaz; I Ordiz Alvarez; J Vázquez; F Vizoso Piñeiro
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

9.  Factors Associated With Follow-Up Care Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Farah F Quyyumi; Jason D Wright; Melissa K Accordino; Donna Buono; Cynthia W Law; Grace C Hillyer; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  Diagnostic value of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  E Polat; U Duman; M Duman; A E Atici; E Reyhan; T Dalgic; E B Bostanci; S Yol
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.