Literature DB >> 8873736

Aprotinin in primary valve replacement and reconstruction: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

M N D'Ambra1, C W Akins, E H Blackstone, S L Bonney, L H Cohn, D M Cosgrove, J H Levy, K E Lynch, R Maddi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients having cardiac operations often require blood transfusions. Aprotinin reduces the need for blood transfusions during coronary artery bypass graft operations. To determine the safety and effectiveness of aprotinin in reducing the use of allogeneic blood and postoperative mediastinal chest tube drainage, we studied 212 patients undergoing primary sternotomy for valve replacement or repair.
METHODS: This study was multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Patients received high-dose aprotinin (n = 71), low-dose aprotinin (n = 70), or placebo (n = 71). The study medication was given as a loading dose followed by a continuous infusion and pump prime dose. Heparin administration was standardized. Transfusions, postoperative mediastinal shed blood, and adverse events were tracked.
RESULTS: Demographic profiles were similar among the treatment groups. Aprotinin did not decrease the percentage of patients receiving transfusions when compared with placebo (high-dose aprotinin, 63%, p = 0.092; low-dose aprotinin, 52%, p = 0.592; placebo, 48%). Aprotinin was associated with a reduction in the volume of mediastinal shed blood (high-dose aprotinin vs placebo, p = 0.002; low-dose aprotinin vs placebo, p = 0.017). Adverse events were equally distributed among the treatment groups except for postoperative renal dysfunction (high-dose aprotinin, 11%; low-dose aprotinin, 7%; placebo, 0%; p = 0.01). A disproportionate number of patients in the high-dose aprotinin group with postoperative renal dysfunction also had diabetes mellitus.
CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment in this population did not reduce allogeneic blood use, although there were significant reductions in the volume of mediastinal shed blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873736     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(96)70110-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is there still a role for aprotinin in cardiac surgery?

Authors:  Neel R Sodha; Munir Boodhwani; Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  A risk-benefit assessment of aprotinin in cardiac surgical procedures.

Authors:  W B Dobkowski; J M Murkin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Aprotinin: an update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in open heart surgery and coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  D C Peters; S Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion.

Authors:  David A Henry; Paul A Carless; Annette J Moxey; Dianne O'Connell; Barrie J Stokes; Dean A Fergusson; Katharine Ker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

5.  The effect of antifibrinolytic prophylaxis on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac operations.

Authors:  Abhinav Koul; Victor Ferraris; Daniel L Davenport; Chandrashekhar Ramaiah
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Mortality associated with administration of high-dose tranexamic acid and aprotinin in primary open-heart procedures: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michael Sander; Claudia D Spies; Viktoria Martiny; Christoph Rosenthal; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Christian von Heymann
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  A disheartening story: aprotinin in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Marcus Lien; Eric B Milbrandt
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.