Literature DB >> 23101999

The effect of antifibrinolytic prophylaxis on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac operations.

Abhinav Koul1, Victor Ferraris, Daniel L Davenport, Chandrashekhar Ramaiah.   

Abstract

Antifibrinolytic agents such as aprotinin and epsilon aminocaproic acid limit postoperative bleeding and blood transfusion in patients undergoing cardiac operations using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Recent evidence suggests that these agents have adverse side effects that influence operative mortality and morbidity. We studied postoperative bleeding, transfusion rates, and operative outcomes in our patients in order to assess the efficacy of these agents during cardiac operations requiring CPB. We reviewed records of 520 patients undergoing a variety of cardiac operations between January 2005 and May 2009. We measured multiple variables including pre-operative risk factors, antifibrinolytic agent used, and outcomes of operation, such as measures of bleeding and blood transfusion, as well as serious operative morbidity and mortality. Postoperative bleeding rates varied significantly between patients receiving aprotinin and those receiving aminocaproic acid (P < 0.05). There was an associated 12% decrease in operative site bleeding in aprotinin-treated patients compared with aminocaproic acid. There was no significant difference in the transfusion rates of packed red blood cells between patients receiving aminocaproic acid or aprotinin (P > 0.05), though individuals in the aprotinin group did receive FFP more frequently than patients in the aminocaproic acid group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in morbidity and mortality rates between patients in either drug group (P > 0.05). Our study shows that aprotinin is more effective at controlling operative site bleeding than aminocaproic acid. Reduced operative site bleeding did not portend better outcome or differences in transfusion requirements. Aminocaproic acid remains a safe and cost-effective option for antifibrinolytic prophylaxis because of unavailability of aprotinin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23101999      PMCID: PMC3723192          DOI: 10.9738/CC75.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  16 in total

1.  Effects of minimal-dose aprotinin on coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  N Hayashida; T Isomura; T Sato; H Maruyama; K Kosuga; S Aoyagi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Changes in coagulation patterns, blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass: aprotinin vs tranexamic acid vs epsilon aminocaproic acid.

Authors:  A Menichetti; L Tritapepe; G Ruvolo; G Speziale; A Cogliati; C Di Giovanni; M Pacilli; A Criniti
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.888

3.  A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dean A Fergusson; Paul C Hébert; C David Mazer; Stephen Fremes; Charles MacAdams; John M Murkin; Kevin Teoh; Peter C Duke; Ramiro Arellano; Morris A Blajchman; Jean S Bussières; Dany Côté; Jacek Karski; Raymond Martineau; James A Robblee; Marc Rodger; George Wells; Jennifer Clinch; Roanda Pretorius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Aprotinin in primary valve replacement and reconstruction: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  M N D'Ambra; C W Akins; E H Blackstone; S L Bonney; L H Cohn; D M Cosgrove; J H Levy; K E Lynch; R Maddi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Aprotinin versus desmopressin for patients undergoing operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. A double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  J I Casas; I Zuazu-Jausoro; J Mateo; A Oliver; H Litvan; E Muñiz-Díaz; A Arís; J M Caralps; J Fontcuberta
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of an ultra-low-dose aprotinin regimen in reoperative and/or complex cardiac operations.

Authors:  J F Hardy; S Bélisle; A Couturier; D Robitaille
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.620

7.  Aprotinin impairs coronary endothelial function and down-regulates endothelial NOS in rat coronary microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Sibel Ulker; Pascal P McKeown; Ulvi Bayraktutan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.787

8.  Analyses of coronary graft patency after aprotinin use: results from the International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE) trial.

Authors:  E L Alderman; J H Levy; J B Rich; M Nili; B Vidne; H Schaff; G Uretzky; G Pettersson; J J Thiis; C B Hantler; B Chaitman; A Nadel
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  [Comparison of effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on blood loss in heart surgery].

Authors:  J J Corbeau; J P Monrigal; J P Jacob; C Cottineau; X Moreau; J G Bukowski; J B Subayi; A Delhumeau
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  1995

10.  Aprotinin could promote arterial thrombosis in pigs: a prospective randomized, blind study.

Authors:  C M Samama; E Mazoyer; P Bruneval; P Ciostek; P Bonnin; M Bonneau; J Roussi; O Bailliart; G Pignaud; P Viars
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical Properties and Microbial Composition in High-Temperature Daqu With Different Colors.

Authors:  Ling Deng; Xiang Mao; Dan Liu; Xin-Qiang Ning; Yi Shen; Bo Chen; Hong-Fang Nie; Dan Huang; Hui-Bo Luo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.