Literature DB >> 8873697

Enoxaparin for thromboembolism prophylaxis in spinal injury: preliminary report on experience with 105 patients.

S Harris1, D Chen, D Green.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with spinal injury (SI). Recently, we reported on the effectiveness and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), tinzaparin, in preventing deep vein thrombosis in motor-complete SI patients. Recently, another LMWH, enoxaparin, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for prevention of thromboembolism in hip and knee replacement surgery. Since its approval, we have used 30 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously every 12 h as routine prophylaxis in all hospitalized SI patients. In this retrospective study, we present an analysis of safety and efficacy of the first six months experience, during which 105 patients received the drug. No patient developed clinical evidence of thromboembolism, and none of the 60 venous ultrasound examinations showed a deep vein thrombus. Eleven patients had evidence of hemorrhage, but the LMWH was considered to have contributed to the bleeding in only three. This additional experience with enoxaparin reinforces our previous conclusion that LMWHs are safe and effective thromboprophylactic agents in SI patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873697     DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199609000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  6 in total

Review 1.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Acute pharmacological DVT prophylaxis after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sean Christie; Ginette Thibault-Halman; Steven Casha
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Venous thromboembolism after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Robert W Teasell; Jane T Hsieh; Jo-Anne L Aubut; Janice J Eng; Andrei Krassioukov; Linh Tu
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Dalteparin vs low-dose unfractionated heparin for prophylaxis against clinically evident venous thromboembolism in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Scott Worley; Christine Short; Jeff Pike; David Anderson; Jo-Anne Douglas; Kara Thompson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 5.  Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society.

Authors:  Paul Nyquist; Cynthia Bautista; Draga Jichici; Joseph Burns; Sanjeev Chhangani; Michele DeFilippis; Fernando D Goldenberg; Keri Kim; Xi Liu-DeRyke; William Mack; Kim Meyer
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Within 24 Hours of Surgery for Spinal Cord Injury: Is It Safe and Effective?

Authors:  Seth Ahlquist; Howard Y Park; Benjamin Kelley; Langston Holly; Ayra N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2020-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.