Literature DB >> 8873522

Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection.

G A Porter1, G E O'Keefe, W W Yakimets.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative inadvertent perforation of the rectum is a potentially avoidable complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR). Although widely thought to be detrimental, the impact of inadvertent perforation on outcome has not been conclusively determined, especially after controlling for potential confounding variables. The objective of this study was to determine if inadvertent perforation of the rectum during APR for rectal cancer is an independent risk factor for the adverse outcomes of local recurrence and/or death.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent APR for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum at a single teaching hospital from 1980 to 1990. Data were obtained regarding patient demographics, presence of inadvertent perforation, histopathological characteristics, adjuvant therapy, local recurrence, and survival.
RESULTS: Of 178 patients included in the study, 42 (24%) had inadvertent perforation. By univariate analysis, local recurrence was significantly higher in the perforated group than the nonperforated group (54% vs 17%; P < 0.001). Similarly, 5-year survival was significantly decreased with inadvertent perforation (29% vs 59%; P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis controlling for stage, grade, age, sex, and adjuvant therapy showed inadvertent perforation to be an independent risk factor for both increased local recurrence and decreased 5-year survival (Hazard Ratio for each model).
CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during APR is associated with increased local recurrence and decreased 5-year survival. The detrimental implications of inadvertent perforation during APR mandates meticulous avoidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873522     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00183-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  10 in total

Review 1.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Oncological outcome after incidental perforation in radical rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Fredrik Jörgren; Robert Johansson; Lena Damber; Gudrun Lindmark
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after extralevator abdominoperineal excision and standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Chuan Yu; Hui Peng; Xiao-Sheng He; Ri-Sheng Zhao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with porcine collagen perineal reconstruction (Permacol™): high primary perineal wound healing rates.

Authors:  R L Harries; A Luhmann; D A Harris; J A Shami; B N Appleton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  A systematic review of transabdominal levator division during abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (APER).

Authors:  D L H Baird; C Simillis; C Kontovounisios; Q Sheng; S Nikolaou; W L Law; S Rasheed; P P Tekkis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S K Perdawood; T Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Changing the Way We Manage Rectal Cancer-Standardizing TME from Open to Robotic (Including Laparoscopic).

Authors:  Katrina L Weaver; Leander M Grimm; James W Fleshman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 8.  [Intra-operative local tumor cell dissemination in rectal carcinoma surgery: effect of operation principles and neoadjuvant therapy].

Authors:  S Merkel; W Hohenberger; P Hermanek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  [Problems in the treatment of upper rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  T Junginger; P Hermanek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  [R1 resection in the region of the lower gastrointestinal tract: relevance and therapeutic consequences].

Authors:  M Hünerbein; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.