Literature DB >> 25066528

Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with porcine collagen perineal reconstruction (Permacol™): high primary perineal wound healing rates.

R L Harries1, A Luhmann, D A Harris, J A Shami, B N Appleton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (elAPER) is arguably the modern surgical approach to low rectal cancer and yet results in large defects that may necessitate plastic surgical reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate the quality of prone elAPER surgery with Permacol™ repair of the perineum. The primary end point studied was the rate of primary perineal wound healing.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients having prone elAPER at a single institution to assess surgical morbidity together with pathological and cancer-specific outcomes.
RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2012, 48 patients had prone elAPER with median age of 63 (40-86). Thirty-four patients (72.3%) received neoadjuvant treatment. Median length of stay was 9 days (6-66). With a prone approach, three patients had specimen perforation (6.4%) and seven patients had circumferential margin involvement (14.9%). Complete perineal wound healing was achieved in 34 patients (73.9%) at 4 weeks. Four patients (8.3%) were unhealed at 6 months; one patient required a perineal sinus to be laid open, and another patient required plastic surgical reconstruction. No perineal wound herniae have been identified during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptable oncological outcomes are achieved with the prone extralevator approach. The technique achieves high rates of primary healing, making it an attractive option in centres without access to plastic reconstructive expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25066528     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-014-1963-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  21 in total

1.  Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Cornelius J H van de Velde; Corrie A M Marijnen; Jan H J M van Krieken; Philip Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum.

Authors:  D A Rothenberger; W D Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Inadvertent perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  G A Porter; G E O'Keefe; W W Yakimets
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Holm; A Ljung; T Häggmark; G Jurell; J Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Multivisceral resection for primary locally advanced rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  D A Harris; M Davies; M G Lucas; P Drew; N D Carr; J Beynon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project.

Authors:  G Brown; I R Daniels
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2005

7.  Pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads to few perineal hernias and acceptable wound complication rates with minor movement limitations: single-centre experience including clinical examination and interview.

Authors:  K K Jensen; L Rashid; B Pilsgaard; P Møller; P Wille-Jørgensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Roger Marr; Kevin Birbeck; James Garvican; Christopher P Macklin; Nicholas J Tiffin; Wendy J Parsons; Michael F Dixon; Nicholas P Mapstone; David Sebag-Montefiore; Nigel Scott; David Johnston; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan; Philip Quirke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Foster; S Pathak; N J Smart; G Branagan; R J Longman; M G Thomas; N Francis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 10.  Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision.

Authors:  P J Nisar; H J Scott
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.788

View more
  4 in total

1.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Gürel Neşşar; Ali Eba Demirbağ; Bahadır Celep; Orhan Hayri Elbir; Cüneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 2.  Biologic Mesh Reconstruction of the Pelvic Floor after Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nasra N Alam; Sunil K Narang; Ferdinand Köckerling; Ian R Daniels; Neil J Smart
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-02-16

3.  Oncological outcomes of abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of low rectal cancer: A retrospective review of a single UK tertiary centre experience.

Authors:  Anwar Hussain; Fahad Mahmood; Andrew D W Torrance; Helen Clarke; Cordelia Howitt; Robin Dawson
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2018-06-26

4.  Long-term outcomes of biological mesh repair following extra levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an observational study of 100 patients.

Authors:  P W Thomas; J E M Blackwell; P J J Herrod; O Peacock; R Singh; J P Williams; N G Hurst; W J Speake; A Bhalla; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.781

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.