Literature DB >> 8871456

A reader's guide to the evaluation of screening studies.

C Earle1, P C Hebert.   

Abstract

In this article we will review how a reader should evaluate a screening study. A clinical problem involving screening mammography is presented. We then outline criteria to determine whether screening is appropriate for a given condition. A search for relevant articles is described followed by an outline of the steps used to appraise a screening study critically. An applicable study is examined in detail for such things as the quality of randomisation and outcomes measured. The results of this study are then applied to a patient considered for screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8871456      PMCID: PMC2398369          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.72.844.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of breast cancer.

Authors:  J J Zavertnik; C B McCoy; D S Robinson; N Love
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The epidemiology of mass breast cancer screening--a plea for a valid measure of benefit.

Authors:  J G Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Evaluation of breast cancer screening programs.

Authors:  L Holmberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Is screening for breast cancer cost-effective?

Authors:  A I Mushlin; L Fintor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Guidelines for screening for breast cancer. Is a revision in order?

Authors:  M Moskowitz
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.