BACKGROUND: In vivo retinal injury studies using ultra-short-pulse lasers at visible wavelengths for both rabbit and primate eyes have shown that the degree of injury to the retina is not proportional to the pulse energy, especially at suprathreshold levels. In this paper we present results of calculations and measurements for laser-induced breakdown (LIB), bubble generation, and self-focusing within the eye. METHODS: We recorded on video and measured the first in vivo LIB and bubble generation thresholds within the vitreous in rabbit and primate eyes, using external optics and femtosecond pulses. These thresholds were then compared with calculations from our LIB model, and calculations were made for self-focusing effects within the vitreous for the high peak power pulses. RESULTS: Results of our nonlinear modeling and calculations for self-focusing and LIB within the eye were compared with experimental results. The LIB ED50 bubble threshold for the monkey eye was measured and found to be 0.56 microJ at 120 fs, compared with the minimum visible lesion (MVL) threshold of 0.43 microJ at 90 fs. Self-focusing effects were found to be possible for pulsewidths below 1 ps and are probably a contributing factor in femtosecond-pulse LIB in the eye. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our measurements for the MVL thresholds and LIB bubble generation thresholds in the monkey eye, we conclude that in the femtosecond pulsewidth regime for visible laser pulses, LIB and self-focusing are contributing factors in the lesion thresholds measured. Our results may also explain why it is so difficult to produce hemorrhagic lesions in either the rabbit or primate eye with visible 100-fs laser pulses even at 100 microJ of energy.
BACKGROUND: In vivo retinal injury studies using ultra-short-pulse lasers at visible wavelengths for both rabbit and primate eyes have shown that the degree of injury to the retina is not proportional to the pulse energy, especially at suprathreshold levels. In this paper we present results of calculations and measurements for laser-induced breakdown (LIB), bubble generation, and self-focusing within the eye. METHODS: We recorded on video and measured the first in vivo LIB and bubble generation thresholds within the vitreous in rabbit and primate eyes, using external optics and femtosecond pulses. These thresholds were then compared with calculations from our LIB model, and calculations were made for self-focusing effects within the vitreous for the high peak power pulses. RESULTS: Results of our nonlinear modeling and calculations for self-focusing and LIB within the eye were compared with experimental results. The LIB ED50 bubble threshold for the monkey eye was measured and found to be 0.56 microJ at 120 fs, compared with the minimum visible lesion (MVL) threshold of 0.43 microJ at 90 fs. Self-focusing effects were found to be possible for pulsewidths below 1 ps and are probably a contributing factor in femtosecond-pulse LIB in the eye. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our measurements for the MVL thresholds and LIB bubble generation thresholds in the monkey eye, we conclude that in the femtosecond pulsewidth regime for visible laser pulses, LIB and self-focusing are contributing factors in the lesion thresholds measured. Our results may also explain why it is so difficult to produce hemorrhagic lesions in either the rabbit or primate eye with visible 100-fs laser pulses even at 100 microJ of energy.
Authors: C P Cain; C A Toth; C D DiCarlo; C D Stein; G D Noojin; D J Stolarski; W P Roach Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C A Toth; C P Cain; C D Stein; G D Noojin; D J Stolarski; J A Zuclich; W P Roach Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Clarence P Cain; Robert J Thomas; Gary D Noojin; David J Stolarski; Paul K Kennedy; Gavin D Buffington; Benjamin A Rockwell Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Ginger M Pocock; Jeffrey W Oliver; Charles S Specht; J Scot Estep; Gary D Noojin; Kurt Schuster; Benjamin A Rockwell Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 1.909