Literature DB >> 15241612

Sub-50-fs laser retinal damage thresholds in primate eyes with group velocity dispersion, self-focusing and low-density plasmas.

Clarence P Cain1, Robert J Thomas, Gary D Noojin, David J Stolarski, Paul K Kennedy, Gavin D Buffington, Benjamin A Rockwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In vivo retinal injury studies using sub-50-femtosecond laser pulses in the near-infrared must consider nonlinear effects such as group velocity dispersion (GVD), self-focusing, laser-induced breakdown (LIB) and low-density plasmas (LDPs). In this paper we present the results of our theoretical calculations of nonlinear effects and our experimental measurements for the visible lesion thresholds in live eyes. We compare these values with the measured LIB and LDP thresholds in an artificial eye. All three thresholds were measured with and without pre-chirping the input pulse to compensate for GVD effects.
METHODS: We recorded the minimum visible lesion (MVL) thresholds in vivo for sub-50-fs laser pulses, with and without pre-chirping the input pulses. In addition, we measured the LIB and LDP thresholds, with and without pre-chirping, within an artificial eye. Different degrees of pre-chirping were required to give optimal compensation for GVD in the live eye and the artificial eye. Probit analysis was used on all data, and comparisons among thresholds were made, to determine the effects on the three thresholds of chirp compensation for GVD.
RESULTS: Results of our nonlinear modeling and calculations for GVD compensation, self-focusing, LIB, and low-density plasmas were compared with our experimental results using live eyes and the artificial eye. The damage threshold in live eyes dropped in energy from 0.25 microJ, for the flat-phase input, to 0.17 microJ when optimally chirped pulses were used, while the LIB threshold was reduced from 0.29 microJ to 0.19 microJ with optimally chirped pulses. The LDP threshold dropped from 0.21 microJ to 0.14 microJ with the pre-chirped pulse. At 44 fs, these energies produced peak powers at least twice the calculated critical power that produces nonlinear self-focusing and beam collapse, for propagation of non-aberrated gaussian beams in a uniform medium.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our measurements of the MVL thresholds, with and without GVD compensation, we conclude that the visible lesion thresholds produced by 44 fs pulses in rhesus eyes are increased in energy due to GVD. The MVL ED50 was reduced by one third when the pulse was pre-chirped to compensate for GVD in the eye. This reduction in amplitude also holds true in the artificial eye for the LIB ED50 bubble thresholds and the LDP ED50 plasma channels, when using pre-chirped pulses versus non-chirped pulses. We also conclude from the data presented that low-density plasmas, and not LIB cavitation bubbles, are the probable mediating factor at the visible lesion thresholds observed within live eyes, for pulse durations at and below 50 fs. Therefore, the plasma channel created by LDPs is the major damage mechanism, if not the only damage mechanism, at MVL threshold energies for these pulse durations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241612     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-0924-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  15 in total

1.  Role of laser-induced plasma formation in pulsed cellular microsurgery and micromanipulation.

Authors:  Vasan Venugopalan; Arnold Guerra; Kester Nahen; Alfred Vogel
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-02-04       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Pathology of macular lesions from subnanosecond pulses of visible laser energy.

Authors:  C A Toth; D G Narayan; C P Cain; G D Noojin; K P Winter; B A Rockwell; W P Roach
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Photonic device fabrication in glass by use of nonlinear materials processing with a femtosecond laser oscillator.

Authors:  K Minoshima; A M Kowalevicz; I Hartl; E P Ippen; J G Fujimoto
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Micromachining bulk glass by use of femtosecond laser pulses with nanojoule energy.

Authors:  C B Schaffer; A Brodeur; J F García; E Mazur
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  In situ observation of photoinduced refractive-index changes in filaments formed in glasses by femtosecond laser pulses.

Authors:  K Yamada; W Watanabe; T Toma; K Itoh; J Nishii
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Characterization of sub-10-fs pulse focusing with high-numerical-aperture microscope objectives.

Authors:  J Jasapara; W Rudolph
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.776

7.  Artificial eye for in vitro experiments of laser light interaction with aqueous media.

Authors:  C P Cain; G D Noojin; D X Hammer; R J Thomas; B A Rockwell
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Self-focusing threshold in normally dispersive media.

Authors:  G G Luther; J V Moloney; A C Newell; E M Wright
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 9.  Laser micromanipulation systems as universal tools in cellular and molecular biology and in medicine.

Authors:  K Schütze; H Pösl; G Lahr
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.770

10.  Light distribution on the retina of a wide-angle theoretical eye.

Authors:  A C Kooijman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1983-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Safety assessment in macaques of light exposures for functional two-photon ophthalmoscopy in humans.

Authors:  Christina Schwarz; Robin Sharma; William S Fischer; Mina Chung; Grazyna Palczewska; Krzysztof Palczewski; David R Williams; Jennifer J Hunter
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Localized Photoreceptor Ablation Using Femtosecond Pulses Focused With Adaptive Optics.

Authors:  Kamal R Dhakal; Sarah Walters; Juliette E McGregor; Christina Schwarz; Jennifer M Strazzeri; Ebrahim Aboualizadeh; Brittany Bateman; Krystel R Huxlin; Jennifer J Hunter; David R Williams; William H Merigan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.283

3.  Mitigating phototoxicity during multiphoton microscopy of live Drosophila embryos in the 1.0-1.2 µm wavelength range.

Authors:  Delphine Débarre; Nicolas Olivier; Willy Supatto; Emmanuel Beaurepaire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Lowered threshold energy for femtosecond laser induced optical breakdown in a water based eye model by aberration correction with adaptive optics.

Authors:  Anja Hansen; Romain Géneaux; Axel Günther; Alexander Krüger; Tammo Ripken
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.732

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.