Literature DB >> 8870529

Picture-word differences in a sentence verification task.

P Goolkasian1.   

Abstract

Effects of picture-word format were investigated with four problem-solving items. In Experiment 1, picture-word input was presented for 8 sec followed by a test sentence that included verbatim and inference statements. Subjects made a true/false reaction time to the test sentence. In Experiment 2, the input remained on the screen while the test sentence was presented with varied stimulus onset asynchronies from 0 to 1,000 msec. Results showed that responses to pictures were faster than responses to words, and the format effect was larger with inference than with verbatim sentences. The picture advantage seemed to be due to the nature of the input and how information is extracted from it. The findings are discussed within the context of text-processing theories (Glenberg & Langston, 1992; Larkin & Simon, 1987).

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870529     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Time to understand pictures and words.

Authors:  M C Potter; B A Faulconer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.

Authors:  W R Glaser; M O Glaser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-03

3.  Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.

Authors:  A Paivio
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1975-11

4.  Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models.

Authors:  J W Pellegrino; R R Rosinski; H L Chiesi; A Siegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-07

5.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.

Authors:  J Theios; P C Amrhein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development.

Authors:  C J Brainerd; V F Reyna
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Processing of visually presented clock times.

Authors:  P Goolkasian; D C Park
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.

Authors:  M C Smith; L E Magee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Presentation format and its effect on working memory.

Authors:  Paula Goolkasian; Paul W Foos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

2.  Presentation format effects in working memory: the role of attention.

Authors:  Paul W Foos; Paula Goolkasian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  How the bimodal format of presentation affects working memory: an overview.

Authors:  Serena Mastroberardino; Valerio Santangelo; Fabiano Botta; Francesco S Marucci; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-10-12

4.  Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: Insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification.

Authors:  Pia Knoeferle; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Spatial coding of object typical size: evidence for a SNARC-like effect.

Authors:  Roberta Sellaro; Barbara Treccani; Remo Job; Roberto Cubelli
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.