Literature DB >> 8870060

The effect of fracture and fracture fixation on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation.

J Saulgozis1, I Pontaga, G Lowet, G Van der Perre.   

Abstract

Measurement of the velocity of propagation and attenuation of ultrasound (200 kHz) is believed to be a useful non-invasive technique for assessing the mechanical properties of bone. A new method for the determination of ultrasound velocity and attenuation of longitudinal waves in cortical bone was used in vivo and in situ on intact and fractured human tibiae. The measured ultrasound attenuation and velocity were found to be unaffected by the soft tissue between transducers and bone. The ultrasound velocity in vivo on control tibiae was 3614 +/- 32 m s-1 and the attenuation was 5.52 +/- 0.43 dB MHz-1 cm-1. The ultrasound velocity in fractured tibiae was considerably lower 1 week after fracture (2375 +/- 82 m s-1), but had significantly increased after 3 weeks (to 2882 +/- 90 m s-1). A higher attenuation was measured 1 week after fracture (17.81 +/- 3.91 dB MHz-1 cm-1), but it had decreased again 3 weeks after fracture (10.42 +/- 3.56 dB MHz-1 cm-1). In situ studies under well-defined conditions confirmed the in vivo results. The effects of internal plate fixation and gradually cutting through the cortex on the ultrasound velocity and attenuation were studied in situ. These results demonstrate the clinical potential of this technique for the non-invasive assessment of bone fracture healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8870060     DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/17/3/006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  10 in total

1.  Effect of the cortex on ultrasonic backscatter measurements of cancellous bone.

Authors:  Brent K Hoffmeister; Andrew P Holt; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Axial transmission method for long bone fracture evaluation by ultrasonic guided waves: simulation, phantom and in vitro experiments.

Authors:  Kailiang Xu; Dean Ta; Runxin He; Yi-Xian Qin; Weiqi Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Quantification of fracture healing from radiographs using the maximum callus index.

Authors:  S J Eastaugh-Waring; C C Joslin; J R W Hardy; J L Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Monitoring the mechanical properties of healing bone.

Authors:  L E Claes; J L Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Influence of cortical bone thickness on the ultrasound velocity.

Authors:  Luiz Garcia Mandarano-Filho; Márcio Takey Bezuti; Nilton Mazzer; Cláudio Henrique Barbieri
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  A comparative in vivo ultrasonometric evaluation of normal and delayed fracture healing in sheep tibiae.

Authors:  Giuliano Barbieri; Cláudio Henrique Barbieri
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Influence of the osteosynthesis plate on ultrasound propagation in the bone.

Authors:  Márcio Takey Bezuti; Luiz Garcia Mandarano-Filho; Giuliano Barbieri; Nilton Mazzer; Cláudio Henrique Barbieri
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Correlation between ultrasound velocity and densitometry in fresh and demineralized cortical bone.

Authors:  Alessandro Queiroz de Mesquita; Giuliano Barbieri; Claudio Henrique Barbieri
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Acoustic and thermal characterization of agar based phantoms used for evaluating focused ultrasound exposures.

Authors:  Georgios Menikou; Christakis Damianou
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2017-06-01

10.  In vivo standardization of bone ultrasonometry of the clavicle.

Authors:  Luiz Garcia Mandarano-Filho; Márcio Takey Bezuti; Cláudio Henrique Barbieri
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.365

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.