Literature DB >> 8866878

Selective facilitation of responses to cortical stimulation of proximal and distal arm muscles by precision tasks in man.

M Schieppati1, C Trompetto, G Abbruzzese.   

Abstract

1. The responses of the first dorsal interosseus (1DI), opponens pollicis (OP), extensor digitorum communis (EDC), brachioradialis (BR), biceps brachii (BB) and anterior deltoid (AD) muscles to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex were recorded during different motor tasks. 2. Two precision and two power isometric tasks were investigated. The precision tasks were a pincer grip ('grip') and a thrust against a target with the wrist ('push'). In the former, the prime movers were the intrinsic hand muscles, while the proximal muscles played a postural role. In the latter, the prime movers were the proximal muscles. In both tasks, force was controlled through visual feedback. The power tasks required encirclement of a cylinder with the fingers ('grasp'), or sustaining a weight suspended at wrist level ('load'). 3. Magnetic stimulation was applied in eight subjects by a coil placed over the vertex at 1.1-1.2 times the motor threshold for the most excitable muscles. This produced in the prime mover muscles larger motor-evoked responses (MEPs) during grip or push tasks than grasp or load tasks, in spite of similar background EMG levels. During grip tasks, only one of the two prime movers showed task-dependent changes. In the postural muscle AD there was no significant difference between MEPs during grip and grasp tasks; however, BB responses were larger during grasp than grip tasks. 4. MEPs simultaneously recorded in the prime movers were plotted against each other. The slope of the regression line for AD versus BB was larger in push than load tasks, whilst the changes in MEPs of 1DI and OP were independent during both grip and grasp tasks. 5. In three subjects, MEPs were also elicited by electrical stimulation during grip and grasp tasks. MEP changes tended to parallel those obtained for magnetic stimulation, but the increase in size of the electrically evoked MEPs during the precision task was smaller. 6. In all subjects the median and ulnar nerves were stimulated during grip and grasp tasks, and an H reflex was evoked in the hand muscles of five subjects. In no case did the two tasks produce reflexes of different amplitude. 7. The motor response of both proximal and distal muscles can be task dependent, in spite of the differences in their principal functional role and cortical representation. The modulation is related to the degree of control requested by the task, and is likely to reflect selective changes in the excitability of corticospinal neurones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8866878      PMCID: PMC1158749          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  22 in total

1.  Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  S A Edgley; J A Eyre; R N Lemon; S Miller
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cortical outflow to proximal arm muscles in man.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Task-dependent changes in the size of response to magnetic brain stimulation in human first dorsal interosseous muscle.

Authors:  A K Datta; L M Harrison; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Standardization of facilitation of compound muscle action potentials evoked by magnetic stimulation of the cortex. Results in healthy volunteers and in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Ravnborg; M Blinkenberg; K Dahl
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-06

5.  Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses.

Authors:  B L Day; D Dressler; A Maertens de Noordhout; C D Marsden; K Nakashima; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Control of forelimb muscle activity by populations of corticomotoneuronal and rubromotoneuronal cells.

Authors:  E E Fetz; P D Cheney; K Mewes; S Palmer
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip.

Authors:  R B Muir; R N Lemon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Response of arm flexor muscles to magnetic and electrical brain stimulation during shortening and lengthening tasks in man.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; M Morena; L Spadavecchia; M Schieppati
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  23 in total

1.  Task-dependent modulation of excitatory and inhibitory functions within the human primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Michele Tinazzi; Simona Farina; Stefano Tamburin; Stefano Facchini; Antonio Fiaschi; Domenico Restivo; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is the long-latency stretch reflex in human masseter transcortical?

Authors:  Sophie L Pearce; Timothy S Miles; Philip D Thompson; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How dependent are grip force and arm actions during holding an object?

Authors:  F Danion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Influence of motor unit properties on the size of the simulated evoked surface EMG potential.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Philipp Diehl; Uta Kliesch; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Cortical topography of human first dorsal interroseus during individuated and nonindividuated grip tasks.

Authors:  Karen T Reilly; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Task-specific increase in corticomotor excitability during tactile discrimination.

Authors:  Sabah Master; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Selective modulation of interactions between ventral premotor cortex and primary motor cortex during precision grasping in humans.

Authors:  Marco Davare; Roger Lemon; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The excitability of the human motor cortex increases during execution and mental imagination of sequential but not repetitive finger movements.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; C Trompetto; M Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Crossed corticospinal facilitation between arm and trunk muscles in humans.

Authors:  Shin-Yi Chiou; Paul H Strutton; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.