Literature DB >> 2276047

Cortical outflow to proximal arm muscles in man.

J G Colebatch1, J C Rothwell, B L Day, P D Thompson, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

Corticospinal influences on two antagonistic muscles of the shoulder were studied in 6 normal volunteers. Recordings were made of the discharges of single motor units from the deltoid and pectoralis major muscles and poststimulus time histograms constructed following either anodal electrical or magnetic cortical stimulation via the scalp. Contralateral anodal stimulation caused narrow short-latency peaks of excitation in motor units from both muscles, probably indicative of the arrival of the D or direct corticospinal volley. The size of the peaks led to estimates of the underlying excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) amplitude of 5.5 mV for the deltoid and 2.2 mV for the pectoralis motor units. Magnetic stimulation over the vertex caused multiple early peaks of excitation in motor units from both muscles but these peaks began at a greater latency than those produced by anodal stimulation. Additionally, magnetic cortical stimulation (and, occasionally, contralateral anodal stimulation) caused a previously undescribed period of medium latency excitation in both muscles. These medium latency periods of excitation differed from the earlier events in that they occurred independently of the direction of current flow in the magnetic coil. This raises the possibility that they are the consequence of stimulation of bilaterally distributed cortical motor outflow pathways. The short-latency excitation strongly suggests that, in man, corticomotoneuronal projections exist to proximal as well as distal muscles of the contralateral arm. The strength of the projection to deltoid assessed by this method is similar to that to an intrinsic muscle of the hand and significantly larger than that to its antagonist, pectoralis. The possible bilateral organization of the additional medium-latency projection to these proximal arm muscles may contribute to two characteristic clinical features after a unilateral cerebral lesion, such as stroke: the relative sparing of proximal arm strength compared with distal and, secondly, ipsilateral weakness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2276047     DOI: 10.1093/brain/113.6.1843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  37 in total

1.  Cortical control of spinal pathways mediating group II excitation to human thigh motoneurones.

Authors:  V Marchand-Pauvert; M Simonetta-Moreau; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Suppression of motor neuron firing by transcranial magnetic stimulation in a patient with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  S J Boniface; K R Mills
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Inter-hemispheric asymmetry of ipsilateral corticofugal projections to proximal muscles in humans.

Authors:  Colum D MacKinnon; Angelo Quartarone; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis.

Authors:  Randall F Beer; Julius P A Dewald; Michelle L Dawson; W Zev Rymer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Corticospinal activation of internal oblique muscles has a strong ipsilateral component and can be lateralised in man.

Authors:  Paul H Strutton; Iain D Beith; Sophie Theodorou; Maria Catley; Alison H McGregor; Nick J Davey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Corticospinal projections to upper limb motoneurones in humans.

Authors:  E Palmer; P Ashby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Selective facilitation of responses to cortical stimulation of proximal and distal arm muscles by precision tasks in man.

Authors:  M Schieppati; C Trompetto; G Abbruzzese
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control.

Authors:  D P Carey; E L Hargreaves; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Ipsilateral versus contralateral cortical motor projections to a shoulder adductor in chronic hemiparetic stroke: implications for the expression of arm synergies.

Authors:  Susan Schwerin; Julius P A Dewald; Matthew Haztl; Steven Jovanovich; Michael Nickeas; Colum MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Different mechanisms underlie the long-latency stretch reflex response of active human muscle at different joints.

Authors:  A F Thilmann; M Schwarz; R Töpper; S J Fellows; J Noth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.