Literature DB >> 8865667

High nucleotide sequence variation in a region of low recombination in Drosophila simulans is consistent with the background selection model.

M T Hamblin1, C F Aquadro.   

Abstract

We surveyed nucleotide sequence variation at glucose dehydrogenase (Gld), in a region of low recombination on chromosome 3R, from a population sample of Drosophila simulans. The levels of nucleotide variation were surprisingly high. There was no departure from the expectation of a neutral model for the level of polymorphism, indicating no evidence of a selective sweep in this region. There was a significant deficiency of singleton polymorphisms according to the Fu and Li test, although Tajima and Hudson, Kreitman, and Aguade (HKA) tests do not provide evidence of a significant elevation of variation due to balancing selection. Genetic map data for the D. simulans third chromosome were used to calculate expected values of pi for Gld under a current model of background selection, varying the values for the parameter sh (selection coefficient against deleterious mutations). We show that the recombinational landscape of D. simulans is sufficiently different from that of D. melanogaster that we expect higher variation under the background selection model, even when effective population sizes are assumed to be equal. The data for Gld were tested against the predictions using computer simulations of the distribution of the number of segregating sites conditioned on pi. Background selection alone can explain our observations as long as sh is larger than 0.005 and species-level effective population size is assumed to be several-fold larger than in D. melanogaster. Alternatively, the deleterious mutation rate may be smaller in D. simulans, or balancing selection may be acting nearby, thereby reducing the effect of background selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865667     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  13 in total

1.  Contrasting patterns of nonneutral evolution in proteins encoded in nuclear and mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  D M Weinreich; D M Rand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Variation after a selective sweep in a subdivided population.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Stepping-stone spatial structure causes slow decay of linkage disequilibrium and shifts the site frequency spectrum.

Authors:  Arkendra De; Richard Durrett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Reduced X-linked nucleotide polymorphism in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  D J Begun; P Whitley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular variation at the In(2L)t proximal breakpoint site in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; M Kreitman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes.

Authors:  Floyd A Reed; Joshua M Akey; Charles F Aquadro
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus.

Authors:  M W Nachman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Patterns of DNA sequence variation suggest the recent action of positive selection in the janus-ocnus region of Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  J Parsch; C D Meiklejohn; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Rate variation of DNA sequence evolution in the Drosophila lineages.

Authors:  T S Takano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Influence of two Wolbachia strains on population structure of East African Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Matthew D Dean; Kirrie J Ballard; Anne Glass; J William O Ballard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.