Literature DB >> 16140989

Fitting background-selection predictions to levels of nucleotide variation and divergence along the human autosomes.

Floyd A Reed1, Joshua M Akey, Charles F Aquadro.   

Abstract

The roles of positive directional selection (selective sweeps) and negative selection (background selection) in shaping the genome-wide distribution of genetic variation in humans remain largely unknown. Here, we optimize the parameter values of a model of the removal of deleterious mutations (background selection) to observed levels of human polymorphism, controlling for mutation rate heterogeneity by using interspecific divergence. A point of "best fit" was found between background-selection predictions and estimates of human effective population sizes, with reasonable parameter estimates whose uncertainty was assessed by bootstrapping. The results suggest that the purging of deleterious alleles has had some influence on shaping levels of human variation, although the effects may be subtle over the majority of the human genome. A significant relationship was found between background-selection predictions and measures of skew in the allele frequency distribution. The genome-wide action of selection (positive and/or negative) is required to explain this observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140989      PMCID: PMC1199535          DOI: 10.1101/gr.3413205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  114 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Maria E Orive
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The neurotransmitter dopamine inhibits angiogenesis induced by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  S Basu; J A Nagy; S Pal; E Vasile; I A Eckelhoefer; V S Bliss; E J Manseau; P S Dasgupta; H F Dvorak; D Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Norwalk virus infection and disease is associated with ABO histo-blood group type.

Authors:  Anne M Hutson; Robert L Atmar; David Y Graham; Mary K Estes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Low nucleotide diversity in man.

Authors:  W H Li; L A Sadler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  26 in total

1.  Natural selection shapes nucleotide polymorphism across the genome of the nematode Caenorhabditis briggsae.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Widely distributed noncoding purifying selection in the human genome.

Authors:  Saurabh Asthana; William S Noble; Gregory Kryukov; Charles E Grant; Shamil Sunyaev; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Making sense of genomic islands of differentiation in light of speciation.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Joint Prediction of the Effective Population Size and the Rate of Fixation of Deleterious Mutations.

Authors:  Enrique Santiago; Armando Caballero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Background selection in single genes may explain patterns of codon bias.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The Temporal Dynamics of Background Selection in Nonequilibrium Populations.

Authors:  Raul Torres; Markus G Stetter; Ryan D Hernandez; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments.

Authors:  Jon Seger; Wendy A Smith; Jarom J Perry; Jessalynn Hunn; Zofia A Kaliszewska; Luciano La Sala; Luciana Pozzi; Victoria J Rowntree; Frederick R Adler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Fine-scale mapping of recombination rate in Drosophila refines its correlation to diversity and divergence.

Authors:  Rob J Kulathinal; Sarah M Bennett; Courtney L Fitzpatrick; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Widespread genomic signatures of natural selection in hominid evolution.

Authors:  Graham McVicker; David Gordon; Colleen Davis; Phil Green
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.