Literature DB >> 8865651

Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.

D Kewley-Port1, X Li, Y Zheng, A T Neel.   

Abstract

The present experiments examined the effect of fundamental frequency (F0) on thresholds for the discrimination of formant frequency for male vowels. Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination were obtained for six vowels with two fundamental frequencies: normal F0 (126 Hz) and low F0 (101 Hz). Four well-trained subjects performed an adaptive tracking task under low stimulus uncertainty. Comparisons between the normal-F0 and the low-F0 conditions showed that formants were resolved more accurately for low F0. These thresholds for male vowels were compared to thresholds for female vowels previously reported by Kewley-Port and Watson [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 485-496 (1994)]. Analyses of the F0 sets demonstrated that formant thresholds were significantly degraded for increases both in formant frequency and in F0. A piece-wise linear function was fit to each of the three sets of delta F thresholds as a function of formant frequency. The shape of the three parallel functions was similar such that delta F was constant in the F1 region and increased with formant frequency in the F2 region. The capability for humans to discriminate formant frequency may therefore be described as uniform in the F1 region (< 800 Hz) when represented as delta F and also uniform in the F2 region when represented as a ratio of delta F/F. A model of formant discrimination is proposed in which the effects of formant frequency are represented by the shape of an underlying piece-wise linear function. Increases in F0 significantly degrade overall discrimination independently from formant frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865651     DOI: 10.1121/1.417954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Predictions of formant-frequency discrimination in noise based on model auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating vowel formant discrimination thresholds using a single-interval classification task.

Authors:  Eric Oglesbee; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Kassidy N Amburgey; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Are men better than women at acoustic size judgements?

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; Anna M Taylor; David Reby
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Spectral timbre perception in ferrets: discrimination of artificial vowels under different listening conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Kerry M M Walker; Andrew J King; Jan W H Schnupp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Intrasexual selection drives sensitivity to pitch, formants and duration in the competitive calls of fallow bucks.

Authors:  Benjamin J Pitcher; Elodie F Briefer; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.