Literature DB >> 8865645

Effects of phase and level on vowel identification: data and predictions based on a nonlinear basilar-membrane model.

J I Alcántara1, I Holube, B C Moore.   

Abstract

This paper examines the role of component phase and level on vowel identification and interprets the results in terms of the shapes of the waveforms occurring at the outputs of the filters in a nonlinear basilar-membrane model. Four normally hearing subjects were asked to identify which of six possible vowel-like harmonic complexes was presented on each trial. The stimuli were complex tones containing the first 35 harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. All of the harmonics below 3000 Hz were equal in amplitude except for three pairs of successive harmonics, at frequencies corresponding to the first three formants of six vowels, which were incremented in level relative to the background harmonics by 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 dB. The components in the harmonic complexes were added in four different starting phase relationships; cosine, random, Schroeder positive, and Schroeder negative. The stimuli were presented at three overall levels; 85, 65, and 45 dB SPL. Performance was similar for the random and Schroeder-negative phases and did not vary as a function of level. Performance for the cosine- and Schroeder-positive-phase conditions was better than for the other two phase conditions, but decreased as the level was reduced. Performance for all four phase conditions was equivalent for the lowest level. The variation in performance as a function of level and component phase is explained in terms of the shapes of the temporal waveforms that would occur at the output of nonlinear "basilar-membrane filters" [H. W. Strube, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1511-1518 (1986)], with asymmetric phase responses about the center frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865645     DOI: 10.1121/1.417948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Phase effects in masking by harmonic complexes: detection of bands of speech-shaped noise.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; John F Culling; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vowel identification by amplitude and phase contrast.

Authors:  Michelle R Molis; Anna Diedesch; Frederick Gallun; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

3.  Speech Discrimination Difficulties in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder Are Likely Independent of Auditory Hypersensitivity.

Authors:  William A Dunlop; Peter G Enticott; Ramesh Rajan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Operator auditory perception and spectral quantification of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound signals.

Authors:  Ann Thuring; K Jonas Brännström; Maria Ewerlöf; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; David Ley; Göran Lingman; Karina Liuba; Karel Maršál; Tomas Jansson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.