Literature DB >> 8865339

Quantifying biological specificity: the statistical mechanics of molecular recognition.

J Janin1.   

Abstract

The Random Energy Model of statistical physics is applied to the problem of the specificity of recognition between two biological (macro)molecules forming a non-covalent complex. In this model, the native mode of association is separated by an energy gap from a large body of non-native modes. Whereas the native mode is unique, the non-native modes form an energy spectrum which is approximated by a gaussian distribution. Specificity can then be estimated by writing the partition function and calculating the ratio r of non-native to native modes at thermodynamic equilibrium. We examine three situations: (i) recognition in the absence of a competitor; (ii) recognition in the presence of a competing ligand; (iii) recognition in a heterogeneous mixture. We derive the dependence of the ratio r on temperature and on the concentration of competing ligands, and we estimate the effect of a local perturbation such as can result from a point mutation. Cases (i) and (iii) are modeled by docking experiments in the computer. In case (iii), which is representative of a wide variety of biological situations, we show that increasing the heterogeneity of a mixture affects the specificity of recognition, even when the concentration of competing species is kept constant.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865339     DOI: 10.1002/prot.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  19 in total

1.  Deciphering common failures in molecular docking of ligand-protein complexes.

Authors:  G M Verkhivker; D Bouzida; D K Gehlhaar; P A Rejto; S Arthurs; A B Colson; S T Freer; V Larson; B A Luty; T Marrone; P W Rose
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  The effect of multiple binding modes on empirical modeling of ligand docking to proteins.

Authors:  R Brem; K A Dill
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Incorporating specificity into optimization: evaluation of SPA using CSAR 2014 and CASF 2013 benchmarks.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Yan; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Quantifying the kinetic paths of flexible biomolecular recognition.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Kun Zhang; Hongyang Lu; Erkang Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A graph theoretical approach for assessing bio-macromolecular complex structural stability.

Authors:  Carlos Adriel Del Carpio; Mihai Iulian Florea; Ai Suzuki; Hideyuki Tsuboi; Nozomu Hatakeyama; Akira Endou; Hiromitsu Takaba; Eiichiro Ichiishi; Akira Miyamoto
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Quantifying the topography of the intrinsic energy landscape of flexible biomolecular recognition.

Authors:  Xiakun Chu; Linfeng Gan; Erkang Wang; Jin Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Simulations of nucleation and early growth stages of protein crystals.

Authors:  A M Kierzek; W M Wolf; P Zielenkiewicz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Protein abundance is key to distinguish promiscuous from functional phosphorylation based on evolutionary information.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Levy; Stephen W Michnick; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  A schematic model for molecular affinity and binding with Ising variables.

Authors:  F Thalmann
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Thermodynamic additivity of sequence variations: an algorithm for creating high affinity peptides without large libraries or structural information.

Authors:  Matthew P Greving; Paul E Belcher; Chris W Diehnelt; Maria J Gonzalez-Moa; Jack Emery; Jinglin Fu; Stephen Albert Johnston; Neal W Woodbury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.