Literature DB >> 8864591

Bone density and quality measurement using ultrasound.

D Hans1, T Fuerst, M Uffmann.   

Abstract

Techniques for measuring bone mineral density have been widely accepted for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. These techniques are clinically feasible, and their fracture prediction capability has been proven in numerous studies. However, it has been demonstrated that bone strength and fracture risk are affected not only by the density of bone but also by other skeletal features including bone composition and microarchitecture. Available techniques for measuring bone mineral density have some disadvantages because they offer limited ability to assess bone quality, are relatively expensive, and use ionizing radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8864591     DOI: 10.1097/00002281-199607000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1040-8711            Impact factor:   5.006


  10 in total

1.  Role of structural anisotropy of biological tissues in poroelastic wave propagation.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Stephen C Cowin
Journal:  Mech Mater       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Reference data for quantitative ultrasound values of calcaneus in 2927 healthy Chinese men.

Authors:  Zi-Qiang Zhu; Wei Liu; Cheng-Li Xu; Shao-Mei Han; Shu-Yu Zu; Guang-Jin Zhu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Fabric dependence of quasi-waves in anisotropic porous media.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Stephen C Cowin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Microarchitecture and bone quality in the human calcaneus: local variations of fabric anisotropy.

Authors:  Mohammad F Souzanchi; Paolo Palacio-Mancheno; Yury A Borisov; Luis Cardoso; Stephen C Cowin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Bone mineral density in cone beam computed tomography: Only a few shades of gray.

Authors:  Marcio José da Silva Campos; Thainara Salgueiro de Souza; Sergio Luiz Mota Júnior; Marcelo Reis Fraga; Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

6.  Can gray values derived from CT and cone beam CT estimate new bone formation? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Farshid Bastami; Shahriar Shahab; Azin Parsa; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas; Mohammad Hadi Noori Kooshki; Mahshid Namdari; Hamidreza Azimi Lisar; Tohid Rafiei; Farahnaz Fahimipour; Majid Salehi; Maissa Jafari
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-31

7.  Fabric dependence of wave propagation in anisotropic porous media.

Authors:  Stephen C Cowin; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2010-05-12

Review 8.  Bone mineral density in patients on maintenance dialysis.

Authors:  Csaba Ambrus; Adrienn Marton; Zsofia Klara Nemeth; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Effect of object location on the density measurement in cone-beam computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Amir Eskandarloo; Mehrdad Abdinian; Fatemeh Salemi; Zahra Hashemzadeh; Mehran Safaei
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-12

10.  Comparisons of Different Screening Tools for Identifying Fracture/Osteoporosis Risk Among Community-Dwelling Older People.

Authors:  Sy-Jou Chen; Yi-Ju Chen; Chui-Hsuan Cheng; Hei-Fen Hwang; Chih-Yi Chen; Mau-Roung Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.