Literature DB >> 8863199

A cognitive-behavioral treatment of patients suffering from "electric hypersensitivity". Subjective effects and reactions in a double-blind provocation study.

B Andersson1, M Berg, B B Arnetz, L Melin, I Langlet, S Lidén.   

Abstract

This study tested psychological treatment of patients with "electric hypersensitivity." Seventeen patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group or a waiting-list control group in a pretest-posttest control group design. The patients were also taking part in double-blind provocation tests before and after the treatment. Subjective ratings of symptoms were registered and blood samples were taken and analyzed for "stress-related" variables, such as prolactin, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone, and cholesterol levels. The patients in the experimental group reduced their evaluations of the disability more than the control group did. This indicates that psychological treatment may be of value in this disease. However, none of the psychophysiological measures or the subjective reactions to the provocation test showed any significant between-group difference. The conclusion from the provocation test is that this group of alleged hypersensitive patients did not react to the electromagnetic fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8863199     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199608000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  9 in total

1.  Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study.

Authors:  G James Rubin; Gareth Hahn; Brian S Everitt; Anthony J Cleare; Simon Wessely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-06

Review 2.  Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria.

Authors:  Christos Baliatsas; Irene Van Kamp; Erik Lebret; G James Rubin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Effects of 60 Hz magnetic fields on teenagers and adults.

Authors:  Sung Kean Kim; Jae Lim Choi; Min Kyung Kwon; Joon Yul Choi; Deok Won Kim
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Investigations on DNA damage and frequency of micronuclei in occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) emitted from video display terminals (VDTs).

Authors:  Nk Lakshmi; R Tiwari; Sc Bhargava; Yr Ahuja
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

5.  Physiological changes and symptoms associated with short-term exposure to electromagnetic fields: a randomized crossover provocation study.

Authors:  Po-Chang Huang; Jui-Chin Chiang; Ya-Yun Cheng; Tain-Junn Cheng; Chien-Yuan Huang; Ya-Ting Chuang; Ti Hsu; How-Ran Guo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  The role of environmental factors in medically unexplained symptoms and related syndromes: conference summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Howard M Kipen; Nancy Fiedler
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Methodological limitations in experimental studies on symptom development in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Kristina Schmiedchen; Sarah Driessen; Gunnhild Oftedal
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.984

8.  Study of self-reported hypersensitivity to electromagnetic fields in California.

Authors:  Patrick Levallois; Raymond Neutra; Geraldine Lee; Lilia Hristova
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Hypersensitivity of human subjects to environmental electric and magnetic field exposure: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Patrick Levallois
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.