Literature DB >> 8863149

Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?

S Hewlett1.   

Abstract

In clinical research the giving of consent by the patient often lies within the context of illness or the doctor/patient relationship. On exploration of these issues it would appear unlikely that the patient's consent is free of substantial influences, some of which may be strong enough to be controlling. Five categories of consent are suggested: voluntary, involuntary, coerced, enforced and partially voluntary. It is argued that consent in clinical research is substantially influenced and thus only partially voluntary. Several practical strategies are proposed to ensure adequately voluntary consent by reducing some circumstantial influences when consent to clinical research is obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8863149      PMCID: PMC1377003          DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.4.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

1.  Visceral viewpoints. Constraint and consent - on being a patient and a subject.

Authors:  H M Spiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-11-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Of mice but not men. Problems of the randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  S Hellman; D S Hellman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-30       Impact factor: 91.245

  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Factors related to voluntary parental decision-making in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Victoria A Miller; Robert M Nelson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Consent for neonatal research.

Authors:  L McKechnie; A B Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  A model of community substituted consent for research on the vulnerable.

Authors:  D C Thomasma
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2000

5.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Conflict of interest issues in informed consent for research on human subjects: a South Asian perspective.

Authors:  Aamir M Jafarey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen Michelle Kirkby; Melanie Calvert; Heather Draper; Thomas Keeley; Sue Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Desperation May Affect Autonomy but Not Informed Consent.

Authors:  Teresa Swift
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-13

Review 9.  Strengths and weaknesses of guideline approaches to safeguard voluntary informed consent of patients within a dependent relationship.

Authors:  Sara A S Dekking; Rieke van der Graaf; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  A Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology.

Authors:  Sara A S Dekking; Rieke van der Graaf; Antoinette Y N Schouten-van Meeteren; Marijke C Kars; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.