Literature DB >> 8860733

Effects of 60 Hz electromagnetic fields on early growth in three plant species and a replication of previous results.

M S Davies1.   

Abstract

In an attempt to replicate the findings of Smith et al., seeds of Raphanus sativus L. (radish), Sinapsis alba L. (mustard), and Hordeum vulgare L. (barley) were grown for between 9 and 21 days in continuous electromagnetic fields (EMFs) at "ion-cyclotron resonance" conditions for stimulation of Ca(2+) (B(H) = 78.3 mu T, B(HAC) = 40 mu T peak-peak at 60 Hz, B(V) = 0). On harvesting, radish showed results similar to those of Smith et al. Dry stem weight and plant height were both significantly greater (Mann-Whitney tests, Ps < 0.05) in EMF-exposed plants than in control plants in each EMF experiment. Wet root weight was significantly greater in EMF-exposed plants in two out of three experiments, as were dry leaf weight, dry whole weight, and stem diameter. Dry root weight, wet leaf weight, and wet whole weight were significantly greater in EMF-exposed plants in one of three experiments. All significant differences indicated an increase in weight or size in the EMF-exposed plants. In each of the sham experiments, no differences between exposed and control plants were evident. Mustard plants failed to respond to the EMFs in any of the plant parameters measured. In one experiment, barley similarly failed to respond; but in another showed significantly greater wet root weight and significantly smaller stem diameter and dry seed weight at the end of the experiment in exposed plants compared to control plants. Although these results give no clue about the underlying bioelectromagnetic mechanism, they demonstrate that, at least for one EMF-sensitive biosystem, results can be independently replicated in another laboratory. Such replication is crucial in establishing the validity of bioelectromagnetic science.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8860733     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1996)17:2<154::AID-BEM10>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  7 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoreception in plants.

Authors:  Paul Galland; Alexander Pazur
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  Magnetic fields: how is plant growth and development impacted?

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Magnetic field regulates plant functions, growth and enhances tolerance against environmental stresses.

Authors:  Ramalingam Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2019-08-21

4.  Growth of etiolated barley plants in weak static and 50 Hz electromagnetic fields tuned to calcium ion cyclotron resonance.

Authors:  Alexander Pazur; Valentina Rassadina; Jörg Dandler; Jutta Zoller
Journal:  Biomagn Res Technol       Date:  2006-02-03

5.  Cell hydration as a biomarker for estimation of biological effects of nonionizing radiation on cells and organisms.

Authors:  Sinerik Ayrapetyan; Jaysankar De
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-18

6.  Influence of Magnetic Field with Schumann Resonance Frequencies on Photosynthetic Light Reactions in Wheat and Pea.

Authors:  Vladimir Sukhov; Ekaterina Sukhova; Yulia Sinitsyna; Ekaterina Gromova; Natalia Mshenskaya; Anastasiia Ryabkova; Nikolay Lin; Vladimir Vodeneev; Evgeny Маreev; Colin Price
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Biochemical and biomolecular effects induced by a static magnetic field in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Evidence for oxidative stress.

Authors:  Ameni Kthiri; Slah Hidouri; Tahri Wiem; Roua Jeridi; David Sheehan; Ahmed Landouls
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.