Literature DB >> 16283069

Magnetoreception in plants.

Paul Galland1, Alexander Pazur.   

Abstract

This article reviews phenomena of magnetoreception in plants and provides a survey of the relevant literature over the past 80 years. Plants react in a multitude of ways to geomagnetic fields-strong continuous fields as well as alternating magnetic fields. In the past, physiological investigations were pursued in a somewhat unsystematic manner and no biological advantage of any magnetoresponse is immediately obvious. As a result, most studies remain largely on a phenomenological level and are in general characterised by a lack of mechanistic insight, despite the fact that physics provides several theories that serve as paradigms for magnetoreception. Beside ferrimagnetism, which is well proved for bacterial magnetotaxis and for some cases of animal navigation, two further mechanisms for magnetoreception are currently receiving major attention: (1) the "radical-pair mechanism" consisting of the modulation of singlet-triplet interconversion rates of a radical pair by weak magnetic fields, and (2) the "ion cyclotron resonance" mechanism. The latter mechanism centres around the fact that ions should circulate in a plane perpendicular to an external magnetic field with their Lamor frequencies, which can interfere with an alternating electromagnetic field. Both mechanisms provide a theoretical framework for future model-guided investigations in the realm of plant magnetoreception.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16283069     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-005-0246-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  124 in total

1.  The effect of static magnetic fields on the rate of calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphorylation of myosin light chain.

Authors:  L A Coulton; A T Barker; J E Van Lierop; M P Walsh
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Extremely low frequency magnetic fields suppress the reduction of germination rate of Arabidopsis thaliana seeds kept in saturated humidity.

Authors:  K Takimoto; H Yaguchi; J Miyakoshi
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.043

3.  Magnetite and magnetotaxis in algae.

Authors:  F F de Araujo; M A Pires; R B Frankel; C E Bicudo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Electric-field ion cyclotron resonance.

Authors:  A R Liboff
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.010

5.  [Dependence of gravitotropic reaction in segments of flax stems on frequency and amplitude of variable components of a weak combined magnetic field].

Authors:  N A Belova; V V Lednev
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  On the mitochondrial aspect of reactive oxygen species action in external magnetic fields.

Authors:  P Waliszewski; R Skwarek; L Jeromin; H Minikowski
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.252

7.  Calcium cyclotron resonance and diatom mobility.

Authors:  S D Smith; B R McLeod; A R Liboff; K Cooksey
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.010

Review 8.  Space biomagnetics.

Authors:  D E Busby
Journal:  Space Life Sci       Date:  1968-03

9.  Magnetic alignment of collagen during self-assembly.

Authors:  J Torbet; M C Ronzière
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Magnetic field of the earth as additional zeitgeber for endogenous rhythms?

Authors:  G Cremer-Bartels; K Krause; G Mitoskas; D Brodersen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1984-11
View more
  32 in total

1.  Changes in the content of lipids in the seeds of magnetically-oriented radish types grown in a weak permanent magnetic field.

Authors:  Y I Novitskii; G V Novitskaya; T K Kocheshkova; M V Dobrovolskii; Y A Serdyukov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.788

2.  Tree-stem diameter fluctuates with the lunar tides and perhaps with geomagnetic activity.

Authors:  Peter W Barlow; Miroslav Mikulecký; Jaroslav Střeštík
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.356

3.  Superoxide radical production and performance index of Photosystem II in leaves from magnetoprimed soybean seeds.

Authors:  Shine Madukakkuzhyil Baby; Guruprasad Kadur Narayanaswamy; Anjali Anand
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Natural experiments indicate that geomagnetic variations cause spatial and temporal variations in coconut palm asymmetry.

Authors:  Peter V Minorsky; Natalie B Bronstein
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  A quantum leap in biology. One inscrutable field helps another, as quantum physics unravels consciousness.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 6.  Magnetic fields: how is plant growth and development impacted?

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.356

7.  Tuned in: plant roots use sound to locate water.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Mavra Grimonprez; Martial Depczynski; Michael Renton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Arabidopsis thaliana root elongation growth is sensitive to lunisolar tidal acceleration and may also be weakly correlated with geomagnetic variations.

Authors:  Peter W Barlow; Joachim Fisahn; Nima Yazdanbakhsh; Thiago A Moraes; Olga V Khabarova; Cristiano M Gallep
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The solid-state photo-CIDNP effect.

Authors:  Jörg Matysik; Anna Diller; Esha Roy; A Alia
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Effect of magnetic fields on cryptochrome-dependent responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Sue-Re Harris; Kevin B Henbest; Kiminori Maeda; John R Pannell; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore; Haruko Okamoto
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.