Literature DB >> 8857858

Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Implications for the treatment of older recipients.

J C Emond1, J F Renz, L D Ferrell, P Rosenthal, R C Lim, J P Roberts, J R Lake, N L Ascher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Living-related liver transplantation (LRLT) has established efficacy in children. In a larger recipient, LRLT requires the use of a small graft because of limits on the donor hepatectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The minimum graft weight required for successful transplantation has not been well established, although a characteristic pattern of graft dysfunction has been observed in our patients who receive small grafts. The authors present a clinicopathologic study of small liver grafts obtained from living donors.
METHODS: Clinical and histologic data were reviewed for 25 patients receiving LRLT. In five older recipients (small group), the graft represented 50% or less of expected liver weight, whereas in 20 others (large group), the graft represented at least 60% of expected liver weight. A retrospective analysis of graft function was conducted by analyzing clinical parameters and histology.
RESULTS: In the small group, 2 of 5 grafts (40%) were lost due to poor function, leading to one patient death (20% mortality), whereas in the large group, 2 of 20 grafts (10%) were lost due to arterial thrombosis without patient mortality. Early ischemic damage related to transplant was comparable with aspartate aminotransferase 203 +/- 23 (small group) and 290 +/- 120 (large group) at 24 hours (p = not significant). Early function was significantly decreased in the small group, with prothrombin time 18.2 +/- 2.2 seconds versus 14.8 +/- 1.6 seconds (large group) on day 3 (p = 0.034). All small group patients developed cholestasis with significantly increased total bilirubin levels at day 7 (16 +/- 5.2 mg% vs. 3.7 +/- 2.7 mg%; p = 0.021) and day 14 (12.0 +/- 7.4 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.7; p = 0.021) compared with the large group. Protocol biopsies in the small group revealed a diffuse ischemic pattern with cellular ballooning on day 7, which progressed to cholestasis in subsequent biopsies. Large group biopsies showed minimal ischemic changes. Three small group patients recovered with normal liver function by 12 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical recovery after a small-for-size transplant is characterized by significant functional impairment associated with paradoxical histologic changes typical of ischemia. These changes apparently are due to graft injury, which can only be the result of small graft size. These findings have significant implications for the extension of LRLT to adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8857858      PMCID: PMC1235420          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199610000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  23 in total

1.  Liver regeneration in recipients and donors after transplantation.

Authors:  S Kawasaki; M Makuuchi; S Ishizone; H Matsunami; M Terada; H Kawarazaki
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Ethics of liver transplantation with living donors.

Authors:  P A Singer; M Siegler; P F Whitington; J D Lantos; J C Emond; J R Thistlethwaite; C E Broelsch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants.

Authors:  C E Broelsch; J C Emond; P F Whitington; J R Thistlethwaite; A L Baker; J L Lichtor
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Orthotopic partial liver transplantation in the rat: a model of 70% hepatectomy and reduced size liver transplantation.

Authors:  R Xia; J C Emond
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Changing indications for liver transplantation.

Authors:  J R Lake
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Orthotopic auxiliary liver transplantation for Crigler-Najjar syndrome type 1.

Authors:  P F Whitington; J C Emond; T Heffron; J R Thistlethwaite
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-09-25       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Baboon-to-human liver transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; J Fung; A Tzakis; S Todo; A J Demetris; I R Marino; H Doyle; A Zeevi; V Warty; M Michaels
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The introduction of microvascular surgery to hepatic artery reconstruction in living-donor liver transplantation--its surgical advantages compared with conventional procedures.

Authors:  K Mori; I Nagata; S Yamagata; H Sasaki; F Nishizawa; Y Takada; F Moriyasu; K Tanaka; Y Yamaoka; K Kumada
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Reconstruction of the hepatic vein in reduced size hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  J C Emond; T G Heffron; P F Whitington; C E Broelsch
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1993-01

Review 10.  Clinical application of liver-related liver transplantation.

Authors:  J C Emond
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.806

View more
  48 in total

1.  [Living donor liver transplantation].

Authors:  K Tanaka; S Kaihara
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation.

Authors:  Bernd B Frericks; Franco C Caldarone; Björn Nashan; Dagmar Högemann Savellano; Georg Stamm; Timm D Kirchhoff; Hoen-Oh Shin; Andrea Schenk; Dirk Selle; Wolf Spindler; Jürgen Klempnauer; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Michael Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Small-for-size syndrome in adult-to-adult living-related liver transplantation.

Authors:  Salvatore Gruttadauria; Duilio Pagano; Angelo Luca; Bruno Gridelli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Excessive portal flow causes graft failure in extremely small-for-size liver transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Hong-Sheng Wang; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi; Yoshitaka Enomoto; Masahiro Usuda; Shigehito Miyagi; Takeshi Asakura; Hiroo Masuoka; Takashi Aiso; Keisuke Fukushima; Tomohiro Narita; Hideyuki Yamaya; Atsushi Nakamura; Satoshi Sekiguchi; Naoki Kawagishi; Akira Sato; Susumu Satomi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Review of the surgical approach to prevent small-for-size syndrome in recipients after left lobe adult LDLT.

Authors:  Vikram Raut; Ruslan Alikhanov; Jacques Belghiti; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Liver function impairment in liver transplantation and after extended hepatectomy.

Authors:  Matteo Serenari; Matteo Cescon; Alessandro Cucchetti; Antonio Daniele Pinna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Hepatic Hemodynamics and Portal Flow Modulation: The A2ALL Experience.

Authors:  Jean C Emond; Nathan P Goodrich; James J Pomposelli; Talia B Baker; Abhinav Humar; David R Grant; Peter Abt; Chris E Friese; Robert A Fisher; Igal Kam; Averell H Sherker; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Current concept of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toru Ikegami; Mitsuo Shimada; Satoru Imura; Yusuke Arakawa; Akira Nii; Yuji Morine; Hirofumi Kanemura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  [Split-liver transplantation].

Authors:  M Loss; A Obed; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Analysis of complications in hepatic right lobe living donors.

Authors:  Ayman Azzam; Kinji Uryuhara; Ito Taka; Yasutsugu Takada; Hiroto Egawa; Koichi Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.