Literature DB >> 1347095

Liver regeneration in recipients and donors after transplantation.

S Kawasaki1, M Makuuchi, S Ishizone, H Matsunami, M Terada, H Kawarazaki.   

Abstract

Reduced-size liver grafts from related donors may not be of an optimal size for adequate function in the recipient. Therefore, liver-graft regeneration is clinically important. We evaluated liver regeneration by liver-volume determinations with serial computed tomography scans in four recipients (aged 9 months to 12 years) and their donors (all fathers of the recipients) after living-related liver transplantation. Standard liver volume was calculated from the recipient's body-surface area. In each recipient, the size of the transplanted liver tended to converge to the standard liver volume with time, regardless of whether initial liver-graft volume was smaller or larger than standard liver volume. In addition, transplanted liver in the recipient regenerated much faster than remnant liver in the donor, even though both consisted of the same hepatocytes, which suggests that regeneration is regulated mainly by factors other than the hepatocytes themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1347095     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90867-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  23 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of acute hepatic failure.

Authors:  T M Rahman; H J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Portosystemic shunting and persistent fetal vascular structures in aryl hydrocarbon receptor-deficient mice.

Authors:  G P Lahvis; S L Lindell; R S Thomas; R S McCuskey; C Murphy; E Glover; M Bentz; J Southard; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  [Living donor liver transplantation].

Authors:  K Tanaka; S Kaihara
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Is computed tomography volumetric assessment of the liver reliable in patients with cirrhosis?

Authors:  Claire Goumard; Fabiano Perdigao; Julien Cazejust; Stéphane Zalinski; Olivier Soubrane; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Donor age affects liver regeneration during early period in the graft liver and late period in the remnant liver after living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Akihiro Tanemura; Shugo Mizuno; Hideo Wada; Tomomi Yamada; Tsutomu Nobori; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Living related liver transplantation in adults.

Authors:  S Kawasaki; M Makuuchi; H Matsunami; Y Hashikura; T Ikegami; Y Nakazawa; H Chisuwa; M Terada; S Miyagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Complications in 100 living-liver donors.

Authors:  H P Grewal; J R Thistlewaite; G E Loss; J S Fisher; D C Cronin; C T Siegel; K A Newell; D S Bruce; E S Woodle; L Brady; S Kelly; P Boone; K Oswald; J M Millis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Volume regeneration of segments 2 and 3 after right portal vein embolization in patients undergoing two-stage hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Thomas A Aloia; Claudius Conrad; Steven Y Huang; Michael J Wallace; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Implications for the treatment of older recipients.

Authors:  J C Emond; J F Renz; L D Ferrell; P Rosenthal; R C Lim; J P Roberts; J R Lake; N L Ascher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Chances and risks in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Jessica Walter; Martin Burdelski; Dieter C Bröring
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.