Literature DB >> 8857013

Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction? Thrombolysis--the preferred treatment.

R A Lange1, L D Hillis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8857013     DOI： 10.1056/NEJM199610243351710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN： 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: Intracoronary stents.

Authors:  M M Gandhi; K D Dawkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

Review 2.  Evidence in medicine: invited commentary.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-01-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Prognostic importance of left ventricular function after angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J P S Henriques; M J de Boer; A W J van 't Hof; J C A Hoorntje; K Miedema; J P Ottervanger; S Reiffers; H Suryapranata; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Cucherat; E Bonnefoy; G Tremeau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

5.  Three years of experience with a mobile angiograph in a center without on-site surgical back-up.

Authors:  Ramazan Akdemir; Hakan Ozhan; Mehmet Yazici; Huseyin Gunduz; Enver Erbilen; Sinan Albayrak; Cihangir Uyan
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.