Literature DB >> 25696719

Prognostic importance of left ventricular function after angioplasty or thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

J P S Henriques, M J de Boer, A W J van 't Hof, J C A Hoorntje, K Miedema, J P Ottervanger, S Reiffers, H Suryapranata, F Zijlstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term clinical outcome after acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy, and to study the determinants of survival.
BACKGROUND: Primary coronary angioplasty results in a higher patency rate and a better short-term survival when compared with thrombolytic therapy, but so far limited information has been available regarding long-term clinical outcome.
METHODS: Patients with acute myocardial infarction (n=395) were randomised to treatment with either intravenous streptokinase or primary angioplasty, and were followed for up to eight years.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients died, 42 patients in the primary coronary angioplasty group compared with 63 patients in the streptokinase group (p=0.03). Death and nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 53 patients in the angioplasty group, compared with 94 patients in the streptokinase group (p<0.001). The major cause of long-term mortality is sudden death. Multivariate analysis showed that left ventricular function was the most important predictor for both total mortality and sudden death.
CONCLUSION: The benefits of primary coronary angioplasty compared with streptokinase are well sustained during long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  myocardial infarction; primary coronary angioplasty; streptokinase; sudden death; ventricular function

Year:  2001        PMID: 25696719      PMCID: PMC2499639     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  19 in total

1.  Therapeutic trials in coronary thrombosis should measure left ventricular function as primary end-point of treatment.

Authors:  R M Norris; H D White
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review.

Authors:  W D Weaver; R J Simes; A Betriu; C L Grines; F Zijlstra; E Garcia; L Grinfeld; R J Gibbons; E E Ribeiro; M A DeWood; F Ribichini
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Danish multicenter randomized study of invasive versus conservative treatment in patients with inducible ischemia after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction (DANAMI). DANish trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  J K Madsen; P Grande; K Saunamäki; P Thayssen; E Kassis; U Eriksen; K Rasmussen; S Haunsø; T T Nielsen; T Haghfelt; P Fritz-Hansen; E Hjelms; P K Paulsen; P Alstrup; H Arendrup; U Niebuhr-Jørgensen; L I Andersen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Aspirin versus coumadin in the prevention of reocclusion and recurrent ischemia after successful thrombolysis: a prospective placebo-controlled angiographic study. Results of the APRICOT Study.

Authors:  A Meijer; F W Verheugt; C J Werter; K I Lie; J M van der Pol; M J van Eenige
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; K R Bailey; M R Hopfenspirger; B J Gersh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Limitation of infarct size and preservation of left ventricular function after primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M J de Boer; H Suryapranata; J C Hoorntje; S Reiffers; A L Liem; K Miedema; W T Hermens; M J van den Brand; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Early thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: limitation of infarct size and improved survival.

Authors:  M L Simoons; P W Serruys; M van den Brand; J Res; F W Verheugt; X H Krauss; W J Remme; F Bär; C de Zwaan; A van der Laarse
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Suryapranata; A W van 't Hof; J C Hoorntje; M J de Boer; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-06-30       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. The protective effects of captopril.

Authors:  M St John Sutton; M A Pfeffer; T Plappert; J L Rouleau; L A Moyé; G R Dagenais; G A Lamas; M Klein; B Sussex; S Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.