Literature DB >> 8855390

Functional architecture of chromosomal DNA domains.

S V Razin1.   

Abstract

More than 20 years ago, it was found that chromosomal DNA in eukaryotic cell nuclei was organized into large loops by periodic attachment to the high salt-insoluble proteinous nuclear (chromosomal) matrix. The specificity of genomic DNA partitioning into loops has been studied intensively trying to find out whether loops may constitute quasiindependent structural-functional units of the genome. These studies have resulted in conflicting findings and, consequently, in conflicting conclusions. Recently, we have developed a conceptually new approach for analysis of specificity of the DNA loop organization by topoisomerase II-mediated excision of individual loops and their oligomers. Using this approach we have obtained new data supporting the supposition that loops may constitute the basic units of genome organization and evolution. In the present article we critically analyze all existing data on specificity and functional significance of chromosomal DNA organization into loops. The goals of this analysis are: 1. To evaluate the available experimental data and try to understand the reasons of the conflicting results obtained by different experimental approaches. 2. Try to answer the long-standing question about a possible correlation between the functional organization of the genome and the mode of its packaging within the nuclei.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8855390     DOI: 10.1615/critreveukargeneexpr.v6.i2-3.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr        ISSN: 1045-4403            Impact factor:   1.807


  11 in total

1.  The loop pattern of chromosomal DNA may significantly differ in AT-rich and GC-rich isochores.

Authors:  E Svetlova; S V Razin
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.788

2.  Topoisomerase II hypersensitive sites in the 5'-terminal region of human dystrophin gene.

Authors:  A A Bystritskii; R Hancock; S V Razin; O V Yarovaya
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.788

3.  In silico prediction of scaffold/matrix attachment regions in large genomic sequences.

Authors:  Matthias Frisch; Kornelie Frech; Andreas Klingenhoff; Kerstin Cartharius; Ines Liebich; Thomas Werner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Mitotic chromosome scaffold structure: new approaches to an old controversy.

Authors:  Andrew S Belmont
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Higher order chromatin structures in maize and Arabidopsis.

Authors:  A L Paul; R J Ferl
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Target genes of Topoisomerase IIβ regulate neuronal survival and are defined by their chromatin state.

Authors:  Vijay K Tiwari; Lukas Burger; Vassiliki Nikoletopoulou; Ruben Deogracias; Sudhir Thakurela; Christiane Wirbelauer; Johannes Kaut; Remi Terranova; Leslie Hoerner; Christian Mielke; Fritz Boege; Rabih Murr; Antoine H F M Peters; Yves-Alain Barde; Dirk Schübeler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  A requiem to the nuclear matrix: from a controversial concept to 3D organization of the nucleus.

Authors:  S V Razin; O V Iarovaia; Y S Vassetzky
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Human matrix attachment regions are necessary for the establishment but not the maintenance of transgene insulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stephanie J Namciu; R E K Fournier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Distribution of gyrase and topoisomerase IV on bacterial nucleoid: implications for nucleoid organization.

Authors:  Ya-Han Hsu; Meng-Wen Chung; Tsai-Kun Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Visualization of early chromosome condensation: a hierarchical folding, axial glue model of chromosome structure.

Authors:  Natashe Kireeva; Margot Lakonishok; Igor Kireev; Tatsuya Hirano; Andrew S Belmont
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.