Literature DB >> 8853278

Abortion patients in 1994-1995: characteristics and contraceptive use.

S K Henshaw1, K Kost.   

Abstract

Results of a 1994-1995 national survey of 9,985 abortion patients reveal that women who live with a partner outside marriage or have no religious identification are 3.5-4.0 times as likely as women in the general population to have an abortion. Nonwhites, women aged 18-24, Hispanics, separated and never-married women, and those who have an annual income of less than +15,000 or who are enrolled in Medicaid are 1.6-2.2 times as likely to do so; residents of metropolitan counties have a slightly elevated likelihood of abortion. When age is controlled, women who have had a live birth are more likely to have an abortion than are those who have never had children. Catholics are as likely as women in the general population to have an abortion, while Protestants are only 69% as likely and Evangelical or born-again Christians are only 39% as likely. Since 1987, the proportion of abortions obtained by Hispanic women and the abortion rate among Hispanics relative to that for other ethnic groups have increased. The proportion of abortion patients who had been using a contraceptive during the month they became pregnant rose from 51% in 1987 to 58%. Nonuse is most common among women with low education and income, blacks, Hispanics, unemployed women and those who want more children. The proportion of abortion patients whose pregnancy is attributable to condom failure has increased from 15% to 32%, while the proportions reporting the failure of other barrier methods and spermicides have decreased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion Seekers; Abortion Surveys; Abortion, Induced; Americas; Contraception; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Fertility Control, Postconception; North America; Northern America; Research Report; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8853278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


  8 in total

1.  Psychological implications of abortion--highly charged and rife with misleading research.

Authors:  Brenda Major
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Jill Shah; Michele G Mandel; Jamie W Krashin; Danielle B Suchdev; Denise J Jamieson; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23

3.  Attitudes and preferences toward the provision of medication abortion in an urban academic internal medicine practice.

Authors:  Cameron Page; Sarah Stumbar; Marji Gold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maegan E Boutot; Michele G Mandel; Maura K Whiteman; Angeline Ti; Emily Petersen; Karen Pazol
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-11-23

5.  Ten Years of Experience in Contraception Options for Teenagers in a Family Planning Center in Thrace and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsikouras; Dorelia Deuteraiou; Anastasia Bothou; Xanthi Anthoulaki; Anna Chalkidou; Eleftherios Chatzimichael; Fotini Gaitatzi; Bachar Manav; Zacharoula Koukoul; Stefanos Zervoudis; Grigorios Trypsianis; George Galazios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Who obtains abortion in Georgia and why?

Authors:  Ekaterine Pestvenidze; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-14

7.  Characteristics of Immigrants Obtaining Abortions and Comparison with U.S.-Born Individuals.

Authors:  Sheila Desai; Ellie Leong; Rachel K Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2018.

Authors:  Katherine Kortsmit; Tara C Jatlaoui; Michele G Mandel; Jennifer A Reeves; Titilope Oduyebo; Emily Petersen; Maura K Whiteman
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2020-11-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.