Literature DB >> 8852835

Double-strand break-induced mitotic intrachromosomal recombination in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

F Osman1, E A Fortunato, S Subramani.   

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene and MATa cutting site were used to introduce site-specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) within intrachromosomal recombination substrates in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The recombination substrates consisted of nontandem direct repeats of ade6 heteroalleles. DSB induction stimulated the frequency of recombinants 2000-fold. The spectrum of DSB-induced recombinants depended on whether the DSB was introduced within one of the ade6 repeats or in intervening unique DNA. When the DSB was introduced within unique DNA, over 99.8% of the recombinants lacked the intervening DNA but retained one copy of ade6 that was wild type or either one of the heteroalleles. When the DSB was located in duplicated DNA, 77% of the recombinants were similar to the deletion types described above, but the single ade6 copy was either wild type or exclusively that of the uncut repeat. The remaining 23% of the induced recombinants were gene convertants with two copies of ade6 and the intervening sequences; the ade6 heteroallele in which the DSB was induced was the recipient of genetic information. Half-sectored colonies were isolated, analyzed and interpreted as evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation. The results are discussed in terms of current models for recombination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8852835      PMCID: PMC1206970     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

1.  Distance-independence of mitotic intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L W Yuan; R L Keil
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The repair of double-strand breaks in DNA; a model involving recombination.

Authors:  M A Resnick
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Different types of recombination events are controlled by the RAD1 and RAD52 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H L Klein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The 12.6 kilobase DNA deletion in Dutch beta zero-thalassaemia.

Authors:  J G Gilman
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process.

Authors:  F L Lin; K Sperle; N Sternberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  C S Hoffman; F Winston
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Relative frequencies of homologous recombination between plasmids introduced into DNA repair-deficient and other mammalian somatic cell lines.

Authors:  W P Wahls; P D Moore
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1990-07

8.  Meiosis-induced double-strand break sites determined by yeast chromatin structure.

Authors:  T C Wu; M Lichten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Mutation in LDL receptor: Alu-Alu recombination deletes exons encoding transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains.

Authors:  M A Lehrman; W J Schneider; T C Südhof; M S Brown; J L Goldstein; D W Russell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Gene conversion between duplicated genetic elements in yeast.

Authors:  J A Jackson; G R Fink
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  26 in total

1.  Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5'-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff.

Authors:  D Strumberg; A A Pilon; M Smith; R Hickey; L Malkas; Y Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Ac insertion site affects the frequency of transposon-induced homologous recombination at the maize p1 locus.

Authors:  Y L Xiao; X Li; T Peterson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes.

Authors:  Li-Lin Du; Toru M Nakamura; Bettina A Moser; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Role of the fission yeast SUMO E3 ligase Pli1p in centromere and telomere maintenance.

Authors:  Blerta Xhemalce; Jacob-S Seeler; Geneviève Thon; Anne Dejean; Benoît Arcangioli
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress.

Authors:  Kirstin L Bass; Johanne M Murray; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast.

Authors:  Jong Sook Ahn; Fekret Osman; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  XPG-related nucleases are hierarchically recruited for double-stranded rDNA break resection.

Authors:  Kevin J Barnum; Y Tram Nguyen; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Initiation of DNA damage responses through XPG-related nucleases.

Authors:  Karen Kuntz; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Differential expression and requirements for Schizosaccharomyces pombe RAD52 homologs in DNA repair and recombination.

Authors:  Michael van den Bosch; José B M Zonneveld; Kees Vreeken; Femke A T de Vries; Paul H M Lohman; Albert Pastink
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Pathway utilization in response to a site-specific DNA double-strand break in fission yeast.

Authors:  John Prudden; Joanne S Evans; Sharon P Hussey; Bryan Deans; Peter O'Neill; John Thacker; Tim Humphrey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.