Literature DB >> 8852655

Haplotype and interspersion analysis of the FMR1 CGG repeat identifies two different mutational pathways for the origin of the fragile X syndrome.

E E Eichler1, J N Macpherson, A Murray, P A Jacobs, A Chakravarti, D L Nelson.   

Abstract

To understand the origins of the fragile X syndrome and factors predisposing alleles to instability and hyperexpansion, we have compared the haplotype (using markers FRAXAC1, FRAXAC2, and DXS548) and AGG interspersion patterns of the FMR1 CGG repeat for 214 normal and 16 premutation chromosomes. Association testing between interspersion pattern and haplotype reveals a highly significant (P < 0.002) non-random distribution, indicating that all three markers are useful in phylogenetic reconstruction of mutational change. Parsimony analysis of the FMR1 CGG repeat substructure predicts that loss of AGG interruptions has occurred independently on many haplotypes associated with the fragile X syndrome, partially explaining the haplotype diversity of this disease. Among haplotypes found in linkage disequilibrium with the fragile X mutation, two different modes of mutation and predisposition to instability have been identified. One pathway has involved the frequent and recurrent loss of AGG interruptions from rare asymmetrical ancestral array structures. Intergenerational transmission studies suggest that these predisposed chromosomes progress relatively rapidly to the disease state. In contrast, the second mutational pathway involves a single haplotype which has maintained two AGG interruptions. Parsimony analysis of CGG repeat substructure within this haplotype suggests that larger alleles have been generated by gradual increments of CGG repeats distal to the most 3' interruption. Pedigree analysis of the intergenerational stability of alleles of this haplotype confirms a gradual progression toward instability thresholds. As a result, a large reservoir of chromosomes carrying large repeats on this haplotype exists. These chromosomes are predisposed to disease. The present data support a model in which there are at least two different mutational pathways predisposing alleles to instability and hyperexpansion associated with the fragile X syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8852655     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/5.3.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  30 in total

1.  Survey of the fragile X syndrome CGG repeat and the short-tandem-repeat and single-nucleotide-polymorphism haplotypes in an African American population.

Authors:  D C Crawford; C E Schwartz; K L Meadows; J L Newman; L F Taft; C Gunter; W T Brown; N J Carpenter; P N Howard-Peebles; K G Monaghan; S L Nolin; A L Reiss; G L Feldman; E M Rohlfs; S T Warren; S L Sherman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  FMR1 haplotype analyses among Indians: a weak founder effect and other findings.

Authors:  Deepti Sharma; Meena Gupta; B K Thelma
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Nucleosomal occupancy and CGG repeat expansion: a comparative analysis of triplet repeat region from mouse and human fragile X mental retardation gene 1.

Authors:  Sonal Datta; Mohammad Parwez Alam; Subeer S Majumdar; Abhishek Kumar Mehta; Souvik Maiti; Neerja Wadhwa; Vani Brahmachari
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  FMR1 CGG Repeats: Reference Levels and Race-Ethnic Variation in Women With Normal Fertility (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation).

Authors:  Lisa M Pastore; Ani Manichaikul; Xin Q Wang; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Predisposition to the fragile X syndrome in Jews of Tunisian descent is due to the absence of AGG interruptions on a rare Mediterranean haplotype.

Authors:  T C Falik-Zaccai; E Shachak; M Yalon; Z Lis; Z Borochowitz; J N Macpherson; D L Nelson; E E Eichler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Familial transmission of the FMR1 CGG repeat.

Authors:  S L Nolin; F A Lewis; L L Ye; G E Houck; A E Glicksman; P Limprasert; S Y Li; N Zhong; A E Ashley; E Feingold; S L Sherman; W T Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Genetic diversity of the fragile X syndrome gene (FMR1) in a large Sub-Saharan West African population.

Authors:  Emmanuel K Peprah; Emily G Allen; Scott M Williams; Laresa M Woodard; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  Closely linked cis-acting modifier of expansion of the CGG repeat in high risk FMR1 haplotypes.

Authors:  S Ennis; A Murray; G Brightwell; N E Morton; P A Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Fragile X AGG analysis provides new risk predictions for 45-69 repeat alleles.

Authors:  Sarah L Nolin; Sachin Sah; Anne Glicksman; Stephanie L Sherman; Emily Allen; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Flora Tassone; Carolyn Yrigollen; Amy Cronister; Marcia Jodah; Nicole Ersalesi; Carl Dobkin; W Ted Brown; Raghav Shroff; Gary J Latham; Andrew G Hadd
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Translation of the FMR1 mRNA is not influenced by AGG interruptions.

Authors:  Anna L Ludwig; Christopher Raske; Flora Tassone; Dolores Garcia-Arocena; John W Hershey; Paul J Hagerman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.