RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A radiologist often wishes to measure organ volume or monitor changes in internal lesion volume during treatment. If this can be determined via three-dimensional ultrasound, the relative simplicity of the procedure and the decreased cost and known risks to the patient would make this method an attractive alternative to other modalities. METHODS: Three-dimensional ultrasound scans were made of six phantoms: four nonechogenic spheres, one echogenic sphere, and one echogenic, irregularly shaped phantom. A total of 22 volume scans were produced. Volume estimations were made using data from cross-sectional areas and from linear measurements. In all, 193 volume estimations were made. These results were compared with known volumes and with volume estimates from computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Three-dimensional ultrasound detected size differences of 10% with 95% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of volume estimates via three-dimensional ultrasound is at least as good as those obtained via conventional ultrasound.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A radiologist often wishes to measure organ volume or monitor changes in internal lesion volume during treatment. If this can be determined via three-dimensional ultrasound, the relative simplicity of the procedure and the decreased cost and known risks to the patient would make this method an attractive alternative to other modalities. METHODS: Three-dimensional ultrasound scans were made of six phantoms: four nonechogenic spheres, one echogenic sphere, and one echogenic, irregularly shaped phantom. A total of 22 volume scans were produced. Volume estimations were made using data from cross-sectional areas and from linear measurements. In all, 193 volume estimations were made. These results were compared with known volumes and with volume estimates from computed tomography scans. RESULTS: Three-dimensional ultrasound detected size differences of 10% with 95% certainty. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of volume estimates via three-dimensional ultrasound is at least as good as those obtained via conventional ultrasound.
Authors: Ozhan M Turan; Sifa Turan; Irina A Buhimschi; Edmund F Funai; Katherine H Campbell; Ozan M Bahtiyar; Chris R Harman; Joshua A Copel; Ahmet A Baschat; Catalin S Buhimschi Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 1.862