Literature DB >> 8849971

Cortical excitability and response variability of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

W van der Kamp1, A H Zwinderman, M D Ferrari, J G van Dijk.   

Abstract

The magnetic evoked potential (MEP) following transcranial magnetic stimulation is subject to several sources of variability. In this study, relationships between stimulus intensity and MEP latency, amplitude, duration, and area of the hypothenar muscles were assessed in 12 right- and 14 left-handed subjects. Effects of handedness, coil orientation, intensity of stimulation, and intersubject variability on these relationships were analyzed. The intraindividual variability was analyzed as the standard deviation (SD) and the coefficient of variation (CV) of four trials. The mean response threshold was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) for preferential stimulation (32%) than for nonpreferential stimulation (45%). With increasing stimulus intensities, MEP amplitudes still increased at 100% intensity in some subjects while in others the stimulus response-relations saturated. MEP amplitudes at an intensity of 20% above threshold ranged between 6 and 100% of MEP amplitude at maximum intensity. Differences between dominant and non-dominant hands were not seen, regardless of handedness. The SD of latency, amplitude, duration, or area depended on stimulus intensity. The CV however, was influenced by the intensity of stimulation: The CV for amplitude decreased from 46% at threshold to 10% at higher intensities. The variability of the MEP amplitude is only related to stimulus intensity when it is expressed in relation to it but not when it is expressed in absolute terms. The stimulus-response relation offers a more extensive measure of cortical excitability than the use of thresholds alone for the measurement of cortical excitability. The question can be raised whether high intensities should be used for clinical testing rather than threshold-related intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8849971     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199603000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  24 in total

1.  The influence of gender, hand dominance, and upper extremity length on motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Scott C Livingston; Howard P Goodkin; Christopher D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.

Authors:  Florinda Ferreri; Fabrizio Vecchio; David Ponzo; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Motor cortical plasticity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - Electromyography studies.

Authors:  Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta; Milind Vijay Thanki; Jaya Padmanabhan; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Intra subject variation and correlation of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  K Roy Choudhury; L Boyle; M Burke; W Lombard; S Ryan; B McNamara
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Exploration and modulation of brain network interactions with noninvasive brain stimulation in combination with neuroimaging.

Authors:  Mouhsin M Shafi; M Brandon Westover; Michael D Fox; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J L Neva; B Lakhani; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; N H M Ledwell; M R Borich; I M Vavasour; C Laule; A L Traboulsee; A L MacKay; L A Boyd
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Statistical Model of Motor-Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; S M Mahdi Alavi; Zhi-De Deng; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael D Guthrie; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; Stewart H Mostofsky; Steve W Wu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Muscle responses to transcranial stimulation in man depend on background oscillatory activity.

Authors:  W Kyle Mitchell; Mark R Baker; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.