Literature DB >> 8849762

Estimation of the optimal cut off point in a new immunological faecal occult blood test in a corporate colorectal cancer screening programme.

M Itoh1, K Takahashi, H Nishida, K Sakagami, T Okubo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the optimal cut off point in a new immunological method (OC-Hemodia) for faecal occult blood testing (FOBT).
SETTING: A corporate colorectal cancer screening programme in Japan. METHOD - The screening programme targeted colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps > or = 10 mm, and was conducted on 27 860 participants (age > or = 40 ) during 1991-92. The follow up consisted of diagnostic management by total colonoscopy on positive screened subjects exceeding the manufacturer recommended cut off level of 50 ng/ml faecal haemoglobin, and the identification of false negative cases by health insurance claims. The optimal cut off point was estimated by the positive predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and a cost effectiveness analysis. In this study evaluation was carried out only for cancer as the target disease.
RESULTS: - At the current cut off level of 50 ng/ml the sensitivity and specificity were 86.5% and 94.9%. When the optimal cut off point was estimated the highest positive predictive value was obtained at 250-350 ng/ml. The ROC curve showed that the sum of sensitivity and specificity is maximised at 50 ng/ml, but evaluation of the ratio, change in sensitivity/change in false positive rate, pointed to higher optimal cut off points, showing marked changes occurring at about 200 ng/ml. The average cost per case was lowest at 250-300 ng/ml. Overall, the optimal cut off point was estimated to be about 200 ng/ml, at which the sensitivity and specificity of the test would be 77.5% and 98.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The optimal cut off point of the new immunological method of FOBT was estimated to be about 200 ng/ml, a value which, more than the current cut off value, favours specificity over sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8849762     DOI: 10.1177/096914139600300204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  16 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Elizabeth G Liles; Stephen Bent; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Camden Bay; Yinghui Xu; Jeanette M Daly; George Bergus; Jeffrey Dunkelberg; Carol Moss
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Prediction of cardiogenic pulmonary edema onset by monitoring right lung impedance.

Authors:  Michael Shochat; Gideon Charach; Shmuel Meyler; Simcha Meisel; Moshe Weintraub; Galina Mengeritsky; Morris Mosseri; Pavel Rabinovich
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Evaluation of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Camden P Bay; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2013-05-12

Review 5.  Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Pieter Ha Wisse; Eline H Schreuders; Aafke van Roon; Leonie van Dam; Ann G Zauber; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Wichor Bramer; Sarah Berhane; Jonathan J Deeks; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique E van Leerdam; Manon Cw Spaander; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-06

Review 6.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  L Sharp; L Tilson; S Whyte; A O'Ceilleachair; C Walsh; C Usher; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; M Barry; H Comber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Cutoff value determines the performance of a semi-quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  L G M van Rossum; A F van Rijn; R J F Laheij; M G H van Oijen; P Fockens; J B M J Jansen; A L M Verbeek; E Dekker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Lesley Tilson; Sophie Whyte; Alan O Ceilleachair; Cathal Walsh; Cara Usher; Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Anthony Staines; Michael Barry; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.